patching...
Update: Two Found Dead in Kinnelon Home. Story Will Be Updated As More Information Becomes Available »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Barack Obama Wins New Jersey

Voters in New Jersey on Tuesday cast their ballot for Barack Obama, giving him the state's 14 electoral votes.

 

Barack Obama won New Jersey’s 14 electoral votes on Tuesday, defeating Republican Mitt Romney.

In the 2008 presidential election, the state voted for the Democratic candidate, and since the 1990s has voted for the overall winner of the presidential race 3 out of 5 times.

Romney and Obama did not campaign aggressively in New Jersey. The state has typically been a Democratic stronghold in recent presidential elections.

Related Topics: election 2012 and presidential election

Kathy Shaffery

9:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I heard that there were some folks who could vote online or in some other fashion up until Friday because of the hurricane. Is that true? If so, how could the state's results be decided?

Comment_arrow

Kelly

12:04 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The race can be called if the number of votes that one candidate is ahead is greater than the number of outstanding ballots to be counted.

simpletruth

9:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

But he's won alot of other states! Go Romney! You have alot of supporters in N.J.

Comment_arrow

Jersey Strong

9:24 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Romney didnt have enough magic in his underwear
Any idea how much of the debt including interest was/is wasted on invading Iraq?
Any idea how much the Afgan war plus interest cost?
How about Medicare Part D?
Since unemployment has never been zero what is the republicon solution to the developmentally disabled the poor the elderly the un wed mothers you know the ppl you conservatives go to church on Sunday to pray for?

Comment_arrow

Global Warming

9:32 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

What's your IQ boy? You don't even know what IQ stands for. Obama Voting, liberal moron.

These Election Results Brought To You By The Letters "F" and "U".

Comment_arrow

Ric

9:49 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

@simpletruth. What is your definition of a lot? I guess you did not know Romney] even lost in New Jersey. He was a big loser everywhere. By the way, alot [sic] is actually two words.

Comment_arrow

Cinnacide

1:14 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

@Globalwarming We need Romney in office! Greatest tragedy in US history! Those billionaires deserve their hard earned money. Obama was born in Nazi Germany. Global warming is a hoax. Change scares me! I'm old, white, and on medicare, I want to drain the system!

Nose Wayne

9:27 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Can't blame me for the next TRILLIONS he will put this country in debt.

Comment_arrow

Run of the Millburn

9:37 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Every president has put this country in debt - no one wants to make the tough decisions in politics your candidate included

Comment_arrow

Sarah

9:55 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Except for Clinton. We had a surplus with Clinton and gas was still just around a dollar a gallon. I miss that guy.

Comment_arrow

RWDALEY

10:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Nose Wayne: PLEASE look at the "facts" not your "feelings". Bill C. left office with a {supposedly) budget surplus, George W. left office with a big deficeit (mostly due to his "tax breaks for the rich" & the unfunded wars in Iraq & Afghanistan). Net is per Mayor Bloomberg...we need to increase taxes & reduce our current expenses, but no politician (Rep or Dem) has the GUTS to stand up to this "math 101" requirement.

Comment_arrow

John M

10:39 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Like getting kicked in the ...

Rufus O'Callahan

9:27 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I don't want a President who is owned by special interests, so I voted for Gary Johnson. Apparently I'm in the minority.

Comment_arrow

John M

9:29 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I guess the others want a socialist.

Comment_arrow

Sally G

9:55 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Rufus,
Being reasonably sure that the president was safe in our state, I voted for Rocky Anderson. I think the president can do better, but he is certainly the lesser of two evils in the Republicrat party.

Comment_arrow

Nick

10:12 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Rufus ... I voted for Johnson, too, for the same reason. Yes, we're in the minority, but this country needs a strong third party.

Comment_arrow

jerseytomato

9:05 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

John M - no, Obama isn't a socialist - he's a stone cold Marxist.

Comment_arrow

XJS

10:22 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I proudly voted for Johnson yesterday as well.

Comment_arrow

Susan

9:47 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I voted for Gary Johnson too - go 3rd party!!!

SP Resident

9:33 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I feel sick...can't afford 4 more years.

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:34 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Move to Canada.... and they have government healthcare for your illness.

Comment_arrow

Bob H

11:07 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

As I live in Canada, I can state that the health care system is cheaper, more efficient, and has no real waiting when someone needs care. I had a heart attack and a week later quintuple by-pass. I had a nerve issue and within a week had appointments with 3 of the 4 specialists my family doctor requisitioned, plus a MRI, xrays, a scan of my leg veins and arteries, etc.
So move to Canada, where the hospitals are PUBLIC hospitals, and there is no private profit motive. Where the doctors swipe your health card, fill in the codes for the work they've done, and get paid monthly by the government. Where the typical hospital has one or two people handling all of the accounting, and a doctor has one or two people helping him, as she/he/they do not need to chase deadbeats, call in collection agencies, or pay high rates for malpractice insurance. And stop stealing our doctors because the U.S. has such a shortfall of the doctors they really need.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

12:53 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@ Bob H, if you plan to blow smoke up peoples *sses, at least do some reading about the Canadian healthcare system.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canada-s-health-care-system-overview-public-and-private-participation

"While most hospitals in Canada operate in this semi-private manner, some hospitals are completely private, operating on either a non-profit or for-profit basis. These are private hospitals that existed prior to the shift by the provincial governments to the role of health care stewards. As such, these private facilities have been allowed to continue providing medical services. Ontario, for example, has eight such private hospitals that are regulated by the provincial Private Hospitals Act and funded by the provincial government through annual budget allotments."

Comment_arrow

Bob H

1:41 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yes, there are a few private hospitals, which existed before any more were banned. So what... The point is that they are they are a miniscule exception. I live in Toronto, and I know the Sholdice which ONLY does Hernia operations and IS indeed private. That is one of the 8. It gets clients from around the world for its expertise. And they get paid the same amount for an operation on an Ontario patient as the public hospitals get. They just make most of their money from non-Ontario patients. That proves nothing, since there has not been one new Private Hospital since that shift you mention, which was in the early 1970s, if memory serves, and this has NOT hurt Ontario, its citizens, or its nurses, etc... except in ways that those in the U.S. would find problematic, such as limiting increase via negotiation with the nurse unions, doctor's union/association, and so on. I fully know about the very few private hospitals, out of the hundreds in the country, so don't quote a bit of nonsense about an archaic hospital system called 'private' hospitals without noting how far back they go in time, and that they were grandfathered.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

3:04 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@ Bob, so I guess you also know about Canadians purchasing private insurance to cover what the gov insurance doesnt?
And you also know that you're government insurance only covers about 70% of what would be catergorized as medical care, the other 30% is payed privately ?

No new hospitals since the 70's?
Except of course this one built in 1996
http://www.csc-surgery.com/

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

3:09 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hmm , do I believe Bob about how fantastic Universal Care is in Canada. And how there are no real wait times.
Or do I believe this:
http://www.cimca.ca/newsletter/issue02_04.html
The "Users Guide to Private Medical Care" in Macleans May 1st Special Edition describes the "relentless march of private health care across the nation."

"For example, The Copeman Healthcare Centre has a private clinic in Vancouver, with plans to expand in other Canadian cities. For an up-front fee and annual fees, patients can buy a health care package including unlimited visits to family doctors and access to health professionals on a 24-hour basis."

"It is a matter of supply and demand. 875,000 Canadians are today waiting for medical treatment. Health care consumes more than a third of provincial revenues, threatening to rise to 44% by 2020. Medical expenses are going up by $5 billion a year, but waiting times and other improvements to health care (e.g. new technology) are not happening. After thirty years of adherence to the policies enshrined in the Canada Health Act, where bureaucratic edict rules in place of market discipline, the current public health care system is unsustainable."

Comment_arrow

Bob H

5:05 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

How do you define medical care? Chiropractor? Dental care? No, that is NOT pure medical. Cancer Care - 100% coverage, Heart Problems, Diabetes, Endocrinology, and a lot of other issues are 100% covered. Rx? Cost is $100 yr & $4.11 a Rx for 90 days worth of the drug [approved drugs]. My bank retiree plan helps pay for others @ 50% for some Rx and dental needs and 80% of the balance. So yes, I pay some things, but I will never be bankrupted by what I need to pay. When my son had cancer - osteogenic sarcoma, had a leg resection, two lung excisions of cancerous growths, a year of chemo and so on, the cost of us was $56 [10%] toward the cost of the wheelchair he needed for a year, and then 20% of his artificial leg, which gets replaced every three years if he needs a replacement, now that he is an adult, but was replaced when he needed it due to growth when he was younger. He is 42 now and a father of 2, and he was 16 when that happened. When I had my bypass in 1999 I paid for the telephone in the hospital. That was it. All the rest was covered by the Provincial plan. Specifically when I do my provincial tax return the maximum I have to pay toward my medical insurance, in the tax return, is $600 for a family. It is income dependent, and in my case is less than that. Buy health insurance in the U.S. for $600 a year and see if it will cover bypass, stents, full cancer treatment and so on without any co-pay. When that happens you can try to tell me I'm full of it, but not before.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

5:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@ Bob , You only pay $600 a year for Medical care ?
It's estimated that 45-50% of all Provinces government spending goes towards medical care.
Where does that money come from ? Money Fairy ?

And yes, the items you listed are considered part of medical coverage in the US.
At least the plan I have anyway.

My problem with people that debate like you is that you're disingenuous.

PS- I've worked with people from Canada in the medical industry. So I know a bit more then what I read online.

Comment_arrow

Ric

6:21 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@mtwnres Cut me a break. You had a conversation two years ago in an airport with a guy who spent a night in Toronto back in 2003 and suddenly you are an expert on the Canadian Healthcare System. Whatever. LOL!
Every time I read something by you I ask "How does Moorestown attract such losers?"

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

6:39 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ric - everytime I read something by you I think..
This guy sure talks a ton of sh*t for some dick that hides behind a screen name.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

6:43 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

And Ric, actually I know someone ( we work in the same industry) that works at the QE2 hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
But don't let that stop you from opening your big mouth and proving once again what an *ss you are.

Comment_arrow

Bob H

10:11 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I live in Ontario and you give me data on British Columbia. That is apples and oranges. Each province controls its own medical care rules as long as the rules are universal in the province and stick to the federal legislation. Sort of like real States Rights.
The article you use is one side of a long ongoing debate, and it is self serving. It has a target and clearly you have become one of its converts. I can speak of my experiences after 43 years of living in Canada, while still voting in New Jersey in Federal elections. Yes, I sometimes have to wait a week or two for a specialist, but I know a lot of people in New York City and its environs who also have to wait to see specialists in their offices, sometimes far longer. I also know that they pay far more than I pay. Yes, some of my taxes go to pay for provincial medical care, where in the U.S. that money goes to the military complex and not to aid the people. We have three tax rates and we do not have mortgage interest paid deductible from income and other such special interest deductions. But I look it as a great benefit. ANYONE gets treated, be they an alcoholic or a Bishop and in any hospital it is always based, in Emergency, on who is in the worst condition, not who has the money to pay, as happened to us in Broward County once, where we were taken from one emergency room across the hospital to the other because we had Canadian medical insurance and those in the first emergency did not have any insurance. UGH!

Comment_arrow

Bob H

10:16 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

And the article you quote from is from 2006, six years ago, and is written by someone from an association of private clinics. Try finding articles that are more recent than 2006 and less biased - you argue using material that is so distorted that it does not even begin to approach accuracy in Ontario's situation.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

11:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@Bob, I'm not arguing to show who has better medical care. I'm sure you believe Canada does, as I believe we do. I'm arguing that if you want to bring up Canadian healthcare as an example of what is better, at least be intellectually honest enough to use accurate information. As you said, don't compare apples and oranges.
Why bring up the military ? We pay taxes to support ours, same as you pay taxes to support yours.
As for your anecdotal accounts. It will get real boring going tit for tat on those.
You have just as many problems with the system in Canada as we do here.

haljalikea kick

9:36 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Go Obama!! Very telling when Romney & Ryan can't even win their own home states!!

Comment_arrow

precious pisces

9:07 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

EXACTLY!!!!! I THOUGHT THE SAME THING.

Comment_arrow

Bob H

10:23 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

And Obama is as much a Republican like Eisenhower was as he is a Democrat. Eisenhower would be called a Socialist by today's Republicans, as he started one of the biggest make work projects the U.S. has ever seen, called the Interstate Highway system! In many ways Obama is so far to the right compared to earlier Republicans, including Lincoln, that they would consider him as a right wing President. People seem to forget history when they spout off...

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

6:52 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

just means those states are full of morons who are on the dole. Just wait to see what four years of an unrestrained Obama bring.

NY Dumpster Diver

9:38 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Apparently the check collectors want more of the same.

I think I'll sign up for disability and get a free phone. We're Screwed!

Comment_arrow

hrd52

6:38 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

do u need the phone or disability,for that matter if in fact you need any govt assistance,then by all means sign up.if you dont really need or qualify.TRY SHUTTING UP,you have no idea the phone as with a bunch of programs started by republicans.IDIOT

Ange

9:46 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Disgusting. Never been so ashamed to be from jersey. and im very jersey strong! but not tonight.

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:41 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Why don't you move to one of those hillbilly states. They all voted for your Mormon preacher and compulsive liar. If you are so ashamed - do us a favor and leave.

Comment_arrow

Jules Vernon

10:34 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Me too. Sad day for America too, that an economically failed President would be re-elected. Can't believe the country voted for the cult of personality over an experienced, successful manager, but I'm not surprised because we are a vapid people who will turn into a failed European social democracy. Let's hope he doesn't send us on the permanent road to ruin and that things aren't too bad andGovernor Christie can save us in 2016 when he is elected president.

Comment_arrow

rosa

9:42 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Proud to be from New Jersey and Proud to be an American!!

Comment_arrow

GJ

12:23 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jules, really? If the two parties refuse to work together to bring the economy back for their own selfish amibitions, I wouldn't call that a failed economic policy. If they would allow for something to happen, anything, it would be better than the current stalled out situation.

-And ange, just stop. Don't judge others for what they believe is the right ideology to follow.

Comment_arrow

Javelin

1:14 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

white trash has been moving out of NJ for years now. Bye bye...

7 out

9:46 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

If Obama is a socialist, then how come the socialist party doesn't endorse his candidacy?

Comment_arrow

John M

10:06 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I guess they're smarter than we give them credit

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

7:02 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obama was part of the Socialist New Party in Illinois in the 90s.

Comment_arrow

Mischa

9:47 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No one said he was in the Socialist Party. The S Party does not have to endorse him. It's like saying that water is wet.

Comment_arrow

Javelin

1:16 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

John M is an idiot. Obama doesn't even come close to being a Socialist. John M is one of those half-wits who repeats what Hannity and Bachman say. He's a nice little pet, a RINO who is helping to destroy the GOP and have it associated with batshit crazies.

7 out

9:47 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

The free cell phone program was started by gw bush

Comment_arrow

John M

10:06 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

But Obama gave them free upgrades

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:09 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Oh yes - Let's blame President Bush again - for everything!

Frank Tine

9:48 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Can't blame me.. I voted for Romney!

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:43 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

You could have saved yourself some time and stayed home today.

7 out

9:49 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

http://stewartalexanderforpresident2012.org/

Here is the candidate from the socialist party of the usa

simpletruth

9:50 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Its a sad day if this basketball, golf playing, liar, do nothing, big spender, job killer, gets re-elected! Company CEO's already said they will be forced to lay-off more workers. Soon there won't be enough workers to support the check- collectors. Our taxes are going to rise to the point that our take home pay will be next to nothing.... i don't get it! God help us.

Comment_arrow

Ben Dover

11:42 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!@@!!!!!! 4 More years. Try working with the President this time. Mitch McConnell - "We want to make Obama a one term President". Too Bad Mitch. You lost. HAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! Romney Sucks. Oh..and Elizabeth Warren also won!!!!! HAHAHA. Your party is pro-rape! LOL!

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:46 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Maybe you can get a job at Bain Capital!

Comment_arrow

KC

1:03 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yes!! And Elizabeth Warren deserved to win! She is a very intelligent, ethical woman who gives em hell.

Comment_arrow

Sally G

1:08 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Lots of women won; Ms Warren is one of the best, but we have Claire McCaskill, Tammy Baldwin, Mazie Hirono, Debbie Stabenow, etc.

Comment_arrow

August West

11:08 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

you don't get it? Why would you believe what the CEO's say? Their interests are not the same as yours or mine. The CEO's threatened to lay-off workers and cut expenses so they could show addititional profits to the compensation committee. That is to insure increases to their already obcene pay packages. Now their taxes are going to go up- that is what they are crying about. Their lobbyists and paid-for congressmen had provided them with tax rates that are lower than yours and mine. The CEO's hoped enough people (like you) wouldn't understand this and they attempted to scare their employees to vote along with them. Fortunately, they've been exposed for their greed and will now have to pay taxes at closer to historical rates. Solving our fiscal problems will require a balanced approach that includes revenue increases along with entiitlement cuts.

Sally G

9:53 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I voted for Rocky Anderson, knowing that my vote would not cause Pres. Obama to lose. He can do better, but I am very glad he won our state.

Kristina G.

10:04 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Union voters...what a disgrace...! We are just slaves in our own State...

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:48 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

God Bless the Unions. Our only defense to stand up against the 1 %!!! If Mittney won the election - your job would sent to China.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:05 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Nobody who really knew Mittsy endorsed him ie, the Morman people and the Massachussets people. That speaks volumes.

Comment_arrow

Sally G

1:09 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

KC,
Interesting point—and telling.

The Good Guy

10:05 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

We weren't given good choices, as has been the case for a long time now. I hope the lesser of the two evils wins (whoever that is). I think most of us vote against a candidate instead of for a candidate. We need a tough, no nonsense candidate who's going to do what it takes to turn this country around. Neither of these guys is capable of that. Well there's always 2016...

Comment_arrow

Karen Banda

12:20 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Agree, Nick. It's always a vote against something instead of for. I know in my gut a billionaire can't understand what it's like for the rest of us. My gut also tells me Obama might be/is more liberal than I'd like. But the majority of the country is not in Romney's stratosphere. People like him pretend but don't really get it. I know from personal experience. Clearly there is a divide in this country but it wasn't created by Barack Obama and his team. It was building. There are the Haves and Have Nots. The political parties, especially the Republicans, have got to get a clue.

Comment_arrow

Sally G

12:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Karen,
I appreciate your comments. My mom has long felt that the Republican party has left her behind, I am more liberal than she, and you, but the extreme represented by Mr. Romney is just too much for so many of us.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:06 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

America needs a third party, but just as we survived Sandy, we survived Romney in my estimation. It would have been even worse if he had been elected.

Comment_arrow

s

9:21 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Karen, Finally, someone with intelligence who can see whats really happening with the Republican party. Their policies and values have continued to move so far to the right, they clearly are only working for a small group of people, "the haves." It's unfortunate, and I hope they finally step up and try and work with this President. The need to put their egos aside and work for the people.

Edward Dooley Jr.

10:08 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Sarah, Are you aware that Clinton had started the whole sub prime mortgage fiasco which led to today's economic situation and the state of our country now?
You may miss him but I sure the H don't...

Comment_arrow

Jim Carbonara

10:39 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Not even close Ed. Most economists on both sides of the aisle feel the sub prime crisis is a direct result of the CRA Act of '77 under Carter and the AMPTA under Reagan in '82. It had been in motion long before Clinton took office.

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:53 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Edward, Are you aware that Bush deregulated Wall street and look what happened. We almost lost our shirt. If President Obama didn't act fast- we would have wound up like Spain or Greece. We aren't out of the woods - but we are still better off.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:10 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I miss Bubba. I had a great job and actually had something left after paying some bills. Your Bushie era tax cuts drove us all broke apart from some seniors who lived the high life while their children and grandchildren suffered. Sorry but you red hats can go red neck and move to the red states if you are going to be such sore losers.

Comment_arrow

jerseytomato

9:22 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jim - yes, Carter started the deregulation of banking as well as oil. Clinton finished it off. The truth is, no matter political party affiliation - if you spend more than you make, you are to blame. There are plenty of people who purchased homes they couldnt afford, and charged entirely too much on credit cards. Bankruptcy may make the debt holder's debt disappear, but it's the working taxpayer who gets stuck with the bill.

Crazy world - Bush didn't 'deregulatate' Wall Street - the Democrats who served under Bush did. They were in charge of the Congress, remember? Thank you for pointing out Spain and Greece because we are following right behind them. Since Harry Reid hasn't produced a budget for the last four years, it's unclear what will happen at this point since our debt equals our GDP.

Comment_arrow

Jenne

10:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yeah, under Clinton were passed both welfare reform (which allows states to limit assistance to able-bodied adults to 2 years) and the loosening of the banking regulation. Welfare reform actually helped (before the recession), but I hate that he made the banking mess possible. Still, if financiers weren't trading mortgage securities like 17th century Dutch tulip growers and there hadn't been so many corrupt mortgage brokers, there wouldn't have been a huge crash in 2008.

Comment_arrow

kaq

12:14 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Right on, Edward Dooley!

maria

10:13 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

7.00 a gallon people... Stupid Stupid people....I didnt vote for him

Comment_arrow

Sally G

11:06 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Our gas prices are some of the lowest in the country, and we have full service only (as does only Oregon alone). We have a strong station owners’ association.
Honestly, the gasoline prices should be higher in our state, and our country—compare Europe. Do you realize that there have been 5 increases in mass transit fares since the last gasoline tax increase in our state? We are giving incentives to gas guzzlers while we do nothing to mitigate our destruction of the environment.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:11 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

On what planet? Look in the mirror when you say stupid.

Comment_arrow

marc Ruffini

9:24 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Gas in NJ is not full service. It is just not self service--full service would include fluid and tire checks.

John M

10:14 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

At least Ocean County got it right. Not that it means anything other than my neighbors are smart.

Comment_arrow

Buster

11:13 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Too bad there weren't enough other counties with the same opinion. :(

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

7:05 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ben - I have observed too many racist comments like this during this election. It is very, very sad.

maria

10:18 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

dumpster,this whole country is going to known as a welfare country..No jobs, what made these people think the next four years were going to be any different than the last

Comment_arrow

Crazy World

11:59 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Because of the idiots in Congress. Unwilling to make a deal or pass a budget. The sacred cow of the republican party is not allowing to tax the rich at the level during the Clinton Presidency. I believe in cutting spending but let everyone share in the burden!!!!

Comment_arrow

Jenne

10:57 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jobs numbers for October were up, actually. Let's see what happens after the fiscal cliff, though. Austerity hasn't worked all that well for Europe, I hope it's better for us.

Comment_arrow

precious pisces

11:25 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Maria welfare has been around for ages. It didn't just arise during the Obama Adminstration. I'm sure your relatives have utilized the system at some point, foodstamps, medicaid, cash or all of the above!!

Comment_arrow

Entitled

11:32 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

"...let everyone share in the burden"
So you're suggesting that everyone pay the same tax rate? That would be great in that it would also eliminate future nasty references to the "47%" since they'd be finally sharing in the burden too.......

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:17 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Agree, Entitled! Let's all of us - 100% of us - share the burden! We should ALL be paying taxes!

Chica2ool

10:21 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

¡MUCHAS GRACIAS NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, MARYLAND, DELAWARE, VERMONT, ILLINOIS, ALL OF NEW ENGLAND AND ESPECIALLY MICHIGAN AND WISCONSIN!

Comment_arrow

Sally G

11:07 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

seconded, and California, Washington, and Hawaii too!

Mary

10:25 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

My town results favored Romney. Thanks for trying Butler!

Sir

10:37 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Sad that he as to win by dividing us - he is a socialist and racist.

Comment_arrow

Sally G

12:54 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I do not see the president as divisive; I see Mr. Romney as more of a divisive figure, so much for the wealthy, dismissing 47% of the population, even if in private.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

8:31 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

It's funny how everyone I call a socialist or a racist starts trying to divide people like me from the sane.

Comment_arrow

s

9:23 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

It is the people in this country that are racist, not the President. Why doesn't everyone just grow up and try to work together to get things done.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:18 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Sally G: Whether you like the 47% comment or not, Romney illuminated a stark inequality in this country. 100% of us should be sharing the burden and paying taxes. He didn't dismiss 47 percent. He called it for what it was. And it should change.

Lauren C.

11:00 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

lame but expected in this state.

Vern

11:10 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Obama wins...another reason to make fun of people from NJ.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

10:23 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yeah, those stupid people in one of the most highly educated states in the union and with higher per-capita incomes than most. Hahaha!

Marlboro Mann

11:36 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

New Jerseyans are the dumbest voters in the world. They walk into the voting booth and vote Democratic even if the candidate is a slug. Unions, minorities, illegals, and unemployed parasites are the Democratic base. This is why we will continue to have socialist programs such as Abbots, COAHs, as well as scores of businesses leaving this wretched state.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:15 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Go polish the silver in your Marlboro McMansion. You lost. Get over it. You will now pay the same amount of tax that the working people do. Puff.

Comment_arrow

s

9:29 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hate to inform you MarlborMann, but hardworking AMERICAN whites are sick and tired of the Republican party who are more interested in their egos than the American people. These people voted for Obama.

Comment_arrow

Entitled

9:37 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Gee whiz KC, I hope I can now pay the same amount of tax that the average working person pays. Because right now I pay approximately 10 times the amount that the average tax payer pays.

Abraham

11:37 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Thank God America decided not to have a president who is not loyal to anything but arrogance. He's a gambler of actions, thats why he only had 1 speech prepared. Amercia needs to understand that all good things take time. Who knows Romney might run as a democrat in 4 yrs...don't be suprised.

Comment_arrow

ozamotaz bukshank

11:41 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Majority of Americans didn't vote for Obamy. Will Obamy do what the majority want?

Comment_arrow

Sally G

12:58 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

ozamotaz,
The latest popular vote I saw, 50.8 million to 50.6 million, is in fact in favor of the president. It DOES indicate a deep divide, I will give you that, but still with an Obama majority. I believe that the president will indeed do the people’s will, especially if we make that clear by getting involved.

Abraham

11:40 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

(Continue)
Unfortunately...we have become a society we want what we want and we want it now. The sad part is we are supposed to teach our kids the opposite...half of us do not even do our homework on the issues or how the system even works.

Edward Dooley Jr.

11:45 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Good luck sucking on the Government teat for another 4 years and God help our Grandchildren IDIOTS that voted for the Socialistic Communist POTUS !!!!!

Comment_arrow

KC

1:18 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Nah nah nah nah nah nah. Sore losers - only believe in the democratic process when they win. Your candidate ran, and lost and I for one say thank God for that.

Abraham

11:49 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Look at all this anger I hope you are not expressing this in front of your kids .Is the name calling making you feel better . It was a free choice elections in the USA grow up , America.

Comment_arrow

GW

12:00 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Just let them cry themselves to sleep!

Hank

12:02 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Great!
I actually need Obamacare!
Hooray for me!
(although I understand that Romney was going to lift the ban on shooting buffalo from trains and I was looking forward to it)
Rush at 1pm can't wait!

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:21 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hank, you're welcome!
Sincerely,
A 2%-er who's paying for your health care
Don't thank Obama, thank me!!

Bayratt

12:12 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I have lost all faith in the Government.

Comment_arrow

GW

1:18 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Poor, poor you. The guy who wanted to dismantle government lost, and your faith in government is gone. Makes sense on some planet, somewhere.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:19 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Well maybe you should have lost faith in corporations first.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:24 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Lose faith in corporations? Are you really serious, KC? That's the most bass-ackwards thing I've ever heard.

Get this: YOU own the fact of whether you're a Have or a Have Not. It's in your power to do anything you want to do, to be as successful as you can be in this world. You could own a corporation if you really tried. It's actually not that hard. But don't knock me, a corporation owner (gasp! CEO!). I put in the hard work and took the risks - you didn't. That's not my fault.

Ben Dover

12:16 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

HAHA. Love to see the anger from these...let me guess...white guys??? HAHA. Suck it dbags. Hope you don't have power yet. F Bipartisanship.

Fox news is a pleasure to watch tonight.

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:39 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

There's something seriously wrong with your brain Mr. Dover. Why are you so mean-spirited?

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:44 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Gee, another brilliant racist comment from Ben Dover. You are filled with hate.

Ben Dover

12:28 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Concede already Mitt. It's over. IT IS OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

GW

12:36 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He hasn't even called Obama yet!

Ben Dover

12:38 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Trump calls for a revolution. Isn't that nice.
What does Sarah Palin have to say??

Comment_arrow

Maggie

8:01 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ugh, who cares what that airhead has to say? She's like a cold sore that keeps coming back.

Comment_arrow

Ric

9:49 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Who is Trump? The name sounds familiar like an '80's song.

PS: Maggie can you tell us how you really feel about Sarah Palin? LOL! You description of her was great! She is another '80's song that needs to discarded.

Ben Dover

12:48 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

"Cuatro mas años" says Jose.
Yes people. They can vote now. Not just raise your kids and cut your lawns and change your parents diapers.

Comment_arrow

beachlover

6:15 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

LOL. But only the legal ones.

Belleville Sentinel

1:03 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Let's hope that as an act of bipartisanship, President Obama offers Williard Romney the opportunity to join his administration in helping truly reforming health care and together they forge a single-payer universal health care system and a final fitting end to the private health insurance industry.

Abraham

1:36 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Lets face it the republicans are out of touch out of tune with the new america demographics ,you can only fake caring for so long. This is a cultural divide in the usa and if you can't articulate the new cultural needs you will not be president .Please express yourself with good language our kids deserve to hear us leaders speak like it. If you can't win your home town or v.p. home town that speak volumes . Voter I.D laws come on .The silent people have spoken and will continue in the next elections.The new cultural america has arrived .

Comment_arrow

Sally G

2:15 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yes, there is a large shift underway, and if it is to be a more caring, humane society, I welcome it. The Republicans have indeed moved away from their roots, going to an extreme that was rejected.
Congratulations, Mr. President!

Sally G

2:16 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Congratulations, Mr. President! Excellent start to the next 4 years.

Ricky

3:18 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Some of you commenters just aren't getting it. It was social issues that defeated Romney, not just the economy.

Comment_arrow

Ric

7:03 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Exactly. We got people looking for a jobs and the repubics are so out of touch, they are only worried about two women or two men getting married.

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:37 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Talking off the cuff like that is easy but not really the case. Every leader wants to see a good economy. This economy is poor due to the deficit, the housing boom that went bust and put many in society into house poor debt. But that doesn't mean a leader can't also be concerned with other (social) issues at the same time dealing with every other issue the country faces.

MaryBeth Adams

6:12 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

How a disgusting failure like this president gets reelected is an embarrassment the US might never recover from.

Comment_arrow

Maggie

6:53 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

At least on Fox News. The country will be just fine.

Comment_arrow

Ric

7:01 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

LOL! SOUR GRAPES FROM YOU! The repubIcs gave the election to Barrack on a sterling silver platter. America is not far right. Get with the times.

"You mention the Navy, for example, and the fact that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. "Well Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets," said the president. "We have these things called aircraft carriers and planes land on them. We have ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines." Obama drove the point home, "It's not a game of Battleship where we're counting ships, it's 'What are our priorities?'"

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:41 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

>>>America is not far right.<<<
America isn't but the Republican party has been and still is held hostage by the far right of social and religious conservatives. Romney himself found out that he had to paint a new picture of himself as being very much conservative from his days as MA. Gov. in order to just get the nomination. The other nominees were rooted out one by one during the primaries by voters who did feel they were too far right.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:19 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He is a complete failure but you would have to examine the record to determine that and his supporters don't do that. The media makes it easy for them too because they don't cover the record. They vote based on their feelings. God help us!

Betsy Ross

6:47 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I'm raising my kids to be on the government system. I need a job so I can get fired and then collect unemployment, welfare, food stamps, free health care, subsidized housing, oh and yeah, a free phone! I know small business owners going into work today and laying someone off! Don't worry Obama will take care of them!

Comment_arrow

Ric

6:57 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

There, there you poor dear. Cry on my shoulder if it makes you feel better. Sounds like sour grapes coming from you. Your republican party handed the election over to Obama. Stupidly the republicans embraced the far right religious nutcases and ignored its moderates. Moderates like me will not associate with the far right or left and Obama was much closer to the center than Mittens.

Y'all need to get our gay marriage and abortion. Focus on jobs and the economy. I mean you don't have to kowtow to bible thumpers. They aren't going to vote democrat. Cheer up; I hear Barrack will need lots of political bunting for his election. With your flag making skills, you should be a shoe in. So Barrack does love you!

So stop crying sour grapes

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:43 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

>>>I'm raising my kids to be on the government system. I need a job so I can get fired and then collect unemployment, welfare, food stamps, free health care, subsidized housing, oh and yeah, a free phone! I know small business owners going into work today and laying someone off! Don't worry Obama will take care of them!<<<
Oh I see, none of this happened at all during the eight years of the GW Bush administration.

Comment_arrow

beachlover

6:28 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Oh for God's sake! There has been some sort of government assistance in this country since the early days of it's existence, so let's just stop blaming Obama for that one. And you pay into unemployment so you are getting your own money! If you work your whole life you don't even collect nearly as much as you put in. While there will always be people who try to take advantage of the system, there are those that truly just fall on hard times (like the people who have lost their jobs because of the hurricane!) Those people need a helping hand once in a while and I for one have no problem with that. We should care more about each other as human beings in the country. Why does that side of us only come out during a disaster? And you know what else I notice, it is usually the people who have the least who help the most. So get off your high horse. Obama isn't perfect, what president is, but he at least is trying to make things work for EVERYONE! Sorry if that includes the less fortunate. I am sure you would rather they just sweep them under a rug.

Comment_arrow

Brody

11:01 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Come on over to our business. We'll be laying off about 25 of our extremely hard working employees because Obamacare is going to put us out of business otherwise.

AnoninCinna

7:12 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Congratulations Mr. President on a victory well deserved!

HereWeGoAgain

7:25 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I grew up in a very small, very poor gulf coast town in Texas in a trailer park where as a kid I ate ketchup sandwiches; if I can make it in this country, anyone can. I worked 80 hours per week for years to get my business where it is. I was a hard-working small business owner looking to maximize growth and revenue potential, you know, the good ol' American Way. With the tax increases that are coming, I won't be able to afford to hire anyone (I was about to post a job opening in Manalapan! - sorry people!). And I'm going to knowingly limit my earning potential this year so I don't have to work harder just to pay more taxes. And I guess I will stick my hand out for government give-aways now just like everyone else seems to. This is what big government does to people - it breaks down the hard-working independent mindset. Big government and its policies say "It doesn't pay to try to get ahead because we're just going to take more from you". And why should i be married to my job just to support others who don't want to work as hard as I do? Granted, there are those with debilitating issues or people devastated by natural disasters - I willingly support these people through community service, my church and my tax dollars. But the debilitating issue of "i just don't want to work hard" is not something that I can support. If everyone worked as hard as I have, this country would be #1 in the world. Instead, this country is turning to one of the USE - United States of Entitlement.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

10:13 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hahahahahahahahaha! That's a good one! I particularly like that old joke about deliberately cutting your income in order to cut the tax burden because 70% of something is a lot worse than 0% of nothing. Funny stuff!

Unless you're serious, then this is just a silly little rant.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:38 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hi J.D.
Yeah, funny stuff when you're talking six figures. I'll take it you don't own your own business. Real funny. LMAO. I guess I'll be paying your health insurance, too. That's even funnier! Hahahahahhaah!!!! The irony!!!

And I'm dead serious. This isn't a silly rant, rather a mindset that many will take. Because why would I work 40 more hours a week to work for small-minded fools like YOU?! Hahahhaah - I won't.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

10:46 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

HereWeGoAgain,

You're batting .000, I'm afraid. Wrong on all counts. I do in fact have my own business, I AM talking six figures, and if you wish to start receiving my health insurance bills I'd be pleased to send them to you, but for now I expect to continue paying them for myself as I have for a decade and a half now.

I reiterate: Talk of cutting one's own income in some vain hope that you'll be doing better by taking home less money is nothing but a silly little rant.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Thank you for your brilliance, J.D. Luke. I wish you the best.

F SANDY

7:34 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

....and i thought last week was sad...

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:56 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

We will all be crying soon and be over-taxed for those who want hand-outs. Then, excess tax burdens to all of the hard-working, educated folks who are in the top tax bracket and who actually "worked" and went to school and made something of themselves. I think it's pitiful. Yes, F. Sandy - very sad.

Hanover Duck

7:42 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

His is going to be four more great years..hahahaha

Abraham

8:08 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Mike we are use to racist like you,that's one of the reasons your guy lost last night.

Mitt Rummey

8:29 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obuma "Thank you for voting for me, I know I screwed the pooch the first time around, but I promise the idiots who voted for me again I won't screw things up again!"

Rich B. Hangen

8:35 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Incredible how many Obama supporters on here have to trash Mitt Romney. He put a hell of a campaign and was graceful in defeat. I'm ready to see what Obama can do different than the last four years. Proof is in the pudding. Spend us out of debt?? Put small business owners in an impossible fiscal bind? Let's go Mr. Obama, election is over and I'm all ears for your plans to unify this divided country.

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:48 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I based my vote purely on their stand on social issues knowing all too well that it wouldn't matter who we elect because both parties have shown themselves to be equal opportunity spenders. The deficit also soared during the eight years of GW Bush.

Comment_arrow

s

11:09 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Hopefully this time the Republicans will put their egos aside and at least try to work things out for the better of Americans. When the Speaker of the House and his party affiliates state "we will not work with this President", shows me that their first priority is not the American people.

J. Clark

8:48 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This contest, ugly as it was, offers evidence that our democracy still works. Competing views, sometimes mutually exclusive, can make for a messy process. Dictatorship and disenfranchisement would be neater, but hardly an improvement. With such a divided electorate, we (and those in office) need to focus on what we can agree about rather than what divides us.

GeneralPatton

9:02 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

it's a given and has been that he would win NJ, all the northern counties etc. But I'd like to see the numbers because it has been shifting-maybe the patch can post these so we can at least see how that is progressing.

Comment_arrow

Sean McCullen

5:37 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

In Camden County, Obama/Biden received 137,795 votes to 63,329 for Romney/Ryan.

Angela rose

9:06 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obama has won in the best states our country has, Romney could not even win his own state. Stop complaining and be thankful for the leader you have. I am sure your economic status hasn't been affected. New Jersey has a Republican governor, but New Jerseans chose someone who has not let them down, President Obamama.

Ann

9:06 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

After such a devastating storm...a happy ending ...Congratulations Mr. President !

Comment_arrow

Ric

9:31 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ann, it amazes me that the Romneyites at Patch did not see this defeat coming. Even our governor Chris Christie saw the writing on the wall last week when he appeared with President Obama. Then Christie Denied Mitt Romney Request To Appear At Campaign Event Days Ahead Of 2012 Election.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/05/chris-christie-mitt-romney_n_2079371.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:49 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Romney could have conceded this election earlier had he done poorly in that first debate. But since he got a bump in polls it gave some much needed hope. The results are not surprising.

Mischa

9:08 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You voted him in again - now our country will suffer long term. You wanted change - now that's all you will have in your pockets. Enjoy! No sour grapes here. Just worried about our great country and it's future. Our poor country - literally. We'll all be sorrrrrry........

Comment_arrow

Ricky

9:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

It hasn't been just the last four years. We also spent ourselves into big time debt under GW Bush.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:41 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

+1 Mischa. No sour grapes, either, from me. Just deeply concerned. Sure, Bush put us in debt, but Obama did nothing except add to that debt and deepened great divisiveness in our country, which we did not need, by utilizing class and racial warfare. What a great leader!!!!

Comment_arrow

Jenne

11:07 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The crash of 2008 and the austerity cuts are what's taking money out of my pocket these days, actually. It's amazing how 'government can't create jobs' but austerity does seem to put people out of a job.

stewart resmer

9:11 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

How low the republicans stooped this time around? OH MY!

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:42 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No lower than the Democrats. Benghazi much?

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:26 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obama ran one of the dirtiest campaigns ever. Romney had class. No comparison in character between the two. I'm sure you have no idea what that means.

taking abreath

9:23 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Interesting how it seems the Boo-Hooers don't really check the facts. Some very sad and ignorant comments. Maybe you could start writing intelligent letters to your senators and representatives and encourage them to start acting like a united body of government for all of the people and not just their very special constituents.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:43 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

+1
Leaders in this country should UNITE the people, not cause such division and hatred.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:26 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Start with Obama. He's been more divisive than anyone.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:50 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Agreed, Truth teller. It's fascinating and sickening all at the same time.

ruth uveges

9:32 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I just want to say that I LOVE Ben Dover 's comments. You are funny as hell. Maybe if people actually found out the platforms they would make intelligent comments. Too many people seem to fixate on innuendo and rumor.

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:57 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ruth - He's not funny. He's a sick and hateful person. Yikes.

Sandy

9:41 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I'm a registered Republican, voted for Christie and will vote for him again, but Romney didn't stand for the middle class, he was/is a puppet for the wealthy.

I am better off than I was 4 years ago, 5 years ago I was laid off without warning at a job I had for 14 years. I had no health insurance and a new born child. Now I am working full time, with benefits and earning more than I did at my prior employment. I thank Obama for that! Living on unemployment benefits and government "hand outs" is not easy & by the way I pay unemployment taxes, so it's not a handout, it's my own money come back to me when I needed it.

I don't understand why some posts have to be so nasty. It seems as if no one can have a debate on the actual issues without personal attacks on intelligence and ethnicity.

The Republicans need to get in touch with reality and realize that women want control of their bodies and everyone regardless of race, creed or sexual orientation has rights that need to be protected. I hope the Republicans embrace bipartisanship so that our country can get back on track.

Comment_arrow

Mischa

9:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You are one of the very few better off then 4 years ago. I'm not being nasty but your comments regarding women's right's and their bodies is out of touch with reality. One person or president does not control the law. RvW is the law and the Supreme Court ruling will not be overturned by one person.

Comment_arrow

Stan Walker

12:52 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

. . . and just when will Obama start embracing bipartisanship?

NJTom

10:04 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The Entitlement Society has spoken. We are now Greece.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:28 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Exactly right! But the morons who voted for Obama have no idea what you mean!

eyes wide shut

10:09 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Maybe just maybe the GOP=Grand OLD Party will start to look at Latino's, women, unions, gays and young voters more instead of concentrating just on the OLD white vote. Its cost them dearly. Education should be of interest for the GOP too, since only 3% of college grads are unemployed. Bottom line is Willard was not one to be believed. And great that Tea Baggers lost 10 seats..Not only didnt Romney carry his home state, Ryan couldn't carry his either. Whats that tell ya. Wake up GOP you are in a world of trouble...Hillary & Cuomo in 2016? hmmmmm nice

Manalapan Resident

10:16 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Bush Jr and Bush Sr are TOTALLY at fault. To deny means your just blind and won't see the truth. Deal with it, your boys did this to us. Bush SR gave Bin Laden the guns and Bush JR ignored the warnings, then invaded a country to because he LIED to the American people that they had WMD. Never found even one! ALL LIES as always from the republicans

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:24 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Ignorant statements and uninformed. You would have voted in Bin Laden if her were a Democrat. Isn't it time to "focus" on the country and not the party.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

10:34 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I agree, Mischa. It wasn't President Bush, it was President Reagan who gave the Mujahideen the guns and training that were then used against us years later in Afghanistan. They were such heroes we even got a "First Blood" movie about them. And of course, President Bush, Don Rumsfeld and Colin Powell were only telling the truth about the WMDs. To this day they're out there and we know where they are, in the areas "around Tikrit and Baghdad and somewhat north, south, east and west of there". Be frightened, because they're still out there, lurking, just waiting for a chance to get ya.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:48 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Blaming does nothing. Each side is to blame, unfortunately and the system is so vast and complex that it cannot be pinned to one and only one constant. Instead of each president blaming the one before, someone should stand up and do things differently. It's clear from all the nastiness in this entire thread that real leadership is needed. We need someone to unite us, not a "leader", ahem, that continues to divide. I think it's foolish to blame one single person or even one single party. It's just not that simple. The real question is how do we get out of this mess?

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:30 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You are really pathetic. This is Obama's economy 100%. Talk about not seeing the truth! Look at Obama's record. On all counts he has failed. You'll have to dig for the data because the media hides it. Where did Saddam Hussein get the WMDs he used to kill the kurds. Do you know what I'm talking about? Probably not! Obama won thanks to ignorance well represented by you!

Manalapan Resident

10:17 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

4 years was not even close to being enought to undo what Bush did to us

Comment_arrow

Mischa

10:42 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

JD Luke - I think that you are a patriot and I respect that and agree. Sounds like you might have been one of our military heroes who are little respected for the great work they do in protecting the rights we take for granted.

Comment_arrow

Rufus O'Callahan

12:02 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You don't "undo" things by making them worse, like piling on over $5 trillion of new debt. I guess that figure doesn't mean anything to you. Of course, the GOP foolishly picked the wrong candidate, someone who was far too similar to Obama (who is really just Bush 2.0) to have any shot at winning.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Pathetic excuse for your failed president. For how many years will Bush be blamed? This is hilarious!

Mischa

10:20 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The GOP should make a lot of changes. What will the next 4 years bring to our "poor" country? In 4 years will the country be stable enough? Doubtful. We are going to be stuck with Joe Biden running in 4 years and that will be a funny sight with a "used car salesman" in the white house (no offense to car salesmen).

AJR

10:22 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I cast my vote for Romney because I truly believe that his experience in Massachusetts proved that he could get things done in a bi-partisan way, and as a successful businessman he would seen the need to cut off the influence of the extremist wing of the party. Ultimately he lost because the Republican party has allowed too many nut jobs into its ranks which scares the heck out of the majority of independent voters and they also did a bad job nationally attracting Hispanic votes.

Comment_arrow

J.D. Luke

10:29 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

So which Romney did you vote for? That was my biggest problem with the man, I couldn't figure out what he REALLY stands for, because it changed to suit his audience.

I believe a man has to stand by what he says. Political operatives may love the etch-a-sketch, but if I can't trust you to stand by your words I can't trust you, full stop.

Comment_arrow

Bob H

10:31 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

If you examine his record of bi-partisanship in Mass you will find that he did NOT get things done in a bi-partisan way. He fought with the Democrats in Mass all the time. As for 'independent' voters, many are Tea Party these days, and the rest are generally conservative and end up voting Republican. Those independents who did lean to the left have become Democrats in the main, so while some independents end up voting Democrat, it turns out that is a small number in the total ranks of current independents, with far more finding the Republican Party too far to the left for them.

Comment_arrow

Rufus O'Callahan

11:52 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

All you need to know about what Massachusetts thought of Mitt Romney is in the numbers: 34% job approval, declining to seek a second term when it became clear he would lose his re-election attempt, and easily losing to Obama among voters in the Bay State. The formula for defeating one failure wasn't replacing him with another. The GOP picked the wrong candidate, and we're all going to suffer because of it.

Angie S.

10:46 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Now that he is done campaigning, I am sure he will be on top of the Benghazi massacre and figure out/investigate WHO gave permission to Carney and Rice to tell ALL the American People a video was the cause of these murders when ALL evidence proved otherwise. Gov. at its best that 2 months have gone by and he can't answer this simple question.

Comment_arrow

Mischa

11:36 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Oh sure - he's so stellar!

paul

10:51 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Sandy, It is not that I don't agree with you on some things especially the nasty comments..but I don't feel that Christie stands for the middle class either. You have individuals who are voting for Obama voting for Christies who is against the local levels in every way... When push comes to shove all anyone cares about is themselves and no one else even thought they pretend that they do. It is sickening to see and helplessness that you can't do anything about it all the real phonies and fakes. People need to look real hard at themselves in the mirror and why they are doing things and what is their motives?

Jim Dunleavy

11:22 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I think the message is that if the House does not start to govern in the interests of the people and not themselves, they will suffer a similar fate as Mr. Romney over the next 2 years. People want them to work for their best interests, not the interests of a political party that now is defined by an older, non diverse membership. Garrett will be one of those looking in from the outside in 2 years

Comment_arrow

Jan

5:22 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jim -- the HOUSE is the body of Congress that actually is based on the number of people in each state. Yes, I want my representative to govern in my interest, but I agree with the House members who would not give in to OBama's ridiculous demands. It is Obama who is uncompromising -- that is a fact -- mentioned even by members of his own party. Clinton was able to compromise, while Obama could not. I am sick and tired of OBama saying that Congress won't work with him. -- Maybe if he didn't RAM Obamacare down everyone's throats, the House would be more accommodating. He is an arrogant man, and I am truly disgusted that he was elected again. The last budget that Obama proposed received NO votes!!! Not even Democrats voted for it.

Jennifer

11:39 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

People want free stuff. Bottom line lol! Those of us who work hard pay for these bottom feeders. 1/3 increase in welfare with this marxist.

Comment_arrow

George Clark

12:31 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

how hard do you work jennifer? You wiping toilets or scrubbing floors in some mansion for 7 dollars and hour? You cutting lawns or doing roofing? Lawyer selling our so called justice? Doctor prescribing unneeded pills so big pharma can rake it in and all our kids can redrink the polluted pee? Let's judge as we all are being judged. What are we waiting for? Let's open the books and see who makes what and for what. That would be unamerican? how can a country, business or household keep it's books in order when they are all closed or not being written in? You think we can just take as much as we want and the free market balances the books? How dishonest or niave that is. Which is it with you?

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:38 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Mr. Clark - not all doctors and lawyers are bad. And CEOs can actually be good people who care about their employees and their communities. Really! Yes, there are bad apples - but they're in EVERY segment and in EVERY wage class. There are thieves everywhere - whether they're cutting your grass or writing your paycheck. There are good people and then there are bad people, no matter their social or financial status. Hating and punishing all business owners for the faults of a few is not the right way to go. Why do YOU need to see MY financial books? What will that information do for you? Make you hate me even more because you feel that the kind of work I do doesn't justify my income? Who are YOU to say?! I run my business by day, write books in my "free" time and scrub my own toilets because thankfully I can do that too! See, my work day isn't just 6 hours. I get up at 5am and work - whether it's toilets or transactions or doggie duty - until 10pm. I don't go on vacations. I work weekends. I am married to my job and that dedication gives me the best gift of all: the pride and happiness of doing something for myself, making a change, living a life that I can be very proud of. When I was a poor girl in a small coastal town in Texas, I never thought this was possible. My parents tried to poison me against the rich and educated. My mom encouraged me to go out on disability at 18 years old! That just wasn't right, and thankfully I rose above that mindset. You can too.

Comment_arrow

suz

2:44 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Boy Jennifer, you are reading my mind!

Mischa

11:43 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Can someone tell me why a "flat tax rate" wouldn't work? I always believed that would be a good solution but apparently I'm wrong. If there is a flat tax rate of say "30% a person making 20K pays a lot less than one who is making 2M a year. Isn't that fair? Of course the burden would still is on the person making more money but I believe it would work. Just wondering so don't shoot me.

Comment_arrow

Rufus O'Callahan

11:54 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The politicians can't have that. It would get in the way of rewarding their top fundraisers with tax loopholes that allow them to pay nothing even if they gross billions of dollars annually (i.e. General Electric).

I am RIGHT

11:52 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Are you only in favor of the process if your candidate wins? That's unamerican.

Jon

12:01 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Get ready for the spate of layoff announcements across industries that are coming, not going to be pretty, corporations have not been hiring, and now they will re accelerate the firing to avoid the extra taxes coming combined with growth restricting regulation,,these young kids living at home post college are in trouble

Comment_arrow

kaq

12:16 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Right on, Jon! Big trouble ahead for our kids . The next generation!

Comment_arrow

Sir

12:39 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jon you are spot on. This country is in trouble. Unfortunately we have become an entitlement society and people will vote for the candidate who gives away the freebies while the rest of society has to pay for them. Fortunately we have a divided congress so we can control or rather block some of his socialist ways We need Christie in 2016 to straighten things out.

Sandy

12:19 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Can you tell me where to buy the Crystal Ball everyone seems to have?
The American Voters have spoken and instead of accusations, misquotes and doomsday predictions, why can't we unite to improve our future as a nation?

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:37 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Because Obama is the most divisive of anyone. He would have to unite the nation but he's not interested in doing that.

Comment_arrow

Jon

4:40 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Hey Sandy, trust im not looking for doomsday by any means, believe me Im generally positive and I dont care who is President as long as it helps the country,,but we are stuck in a real bad situation that Im not sure people realize, i think some people look at the stock market and think the conomy is improving , but its not corporations have been making money the past few years because they cut overhead big time, which is why unemployment is so high,,with the new taxes and regulations that are due to start in '13 they have already forecast to do it again,,,Boeing did it today

George Clark

12:21 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yeah, if the rich investors don't make 20 % off your or some china mens backs they aren't going to create jobs. Lol. that's rich for you. you people, especially republicans, don't know what's good for you. I wanna hear how all those washed out in the cold and dark would have like being under romney who would have killed fema. you people want a satanic kill or be killed way of life and that's exactly what we all are gonna get. The college kids better see the future of winners take all is a losing game for us all because their stupid parents have forgotten this history lesson and their and all our kids are gonna pay dearly for it.

Beth Johansen

12:27 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Disgusting results and another 4 more tears with a disgusting disgraceful president who DOES NOT PERFORM!!!!

Mischa

12:27 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Always nasty remarks and not factual statements from some of the above. This is a young country sir and it doesn't mean it will succeed. Look at history and what has happened to many of the so-called affluent countries who have welfare systems. Some of us are realists. While I am hopeful for the future, I'm not delusional and I want a President that I can respect. A patriot who only wants the good for all of the country - not just the select people who need successful people to bail them out once again. Party lines aside - I hope the college kids will have a job when they graduate.

Beth Johansen

12:32 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Well at least all of the losers can go back to their day time TV and stop pretending that they care one bit. The 'cool' black guy is back and that's all they care about. Fools.

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

12:44 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

He's not cool. He's awesome, and he beat the spray tanned rich guy that hides his money overseas and who writes off 47% of Americans

Comment_arrow

GW

2:41 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Insulting half the people of this country didn't work for Romney; it's a losing proposition for you, too.

George Clark

12:43 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

did nobody lose their pension in the great stock/housing scandal? Did we bail out the banks that robbed the world? did we get that money back or did they just rob us twice? these are the people running your world and government. those smart enought to dupe you all into having to invest in a crooked corrupt exchange house. burn wall street to the ground. they win whether you win or lose. it's a crooked stupid casino you are gambling your pension away in. when will you people learn that power ie money corrupts totally? when will you learn to stop giving your power to a few and work for the common good? until you do this you will always be vicitims of your own vainity and stupidity.

O.J

12:47 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I think the Republicans are having a bad day from all these comments. Or perhaps some people are just furious because they were looking for Romney to bring up their bottom line. Either way, its over with, suck it up until the next election.

Mischa

12:57 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You see, that's part of the problem. It's either Democrat or Republican. I could care less what party the person is as long as they are trust-worthy, will work towards common-goals and love this country enough to go beyond party-lines. That isn't happening.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

2:44 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

+1. That's why *we* the people need to take charge. Unite ourselves and stop waiting for it to happen at the top because it's not going to happen.

The Name You Know

1:00 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Republican since birth and I will say this: I will not vote for Christie again. That gluttonous tool cares more about himself than the Country. Say waht you want about Bloomberg, at least he cared more about governing than exploiting photo ops for hiw own political gain. Have fun in obscurity Christie. You just blew it.

Comment_arrow

J. Clark

2:45 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Some might think that a governor leaving his state at a time of crisis to make a political appearance would represent the worst sort of leadership and judgment -- maybe a bit like Bloomberg's decision to run a marathon while parts of his city still reeled from the storm.

True story

2:30 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

All whites voted for Romey!! Everybody else plus whites voted for the best President everrrr... Barack Hussain Obama.. He got elected with the name Hudsain because we trust him... He means what he says point blank,, it takes money to get us out the mess rich greedy people put us in, Obama opened the door for more to come so get use to it.... Blacks built this country and going to save this country cause this is our country!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:03 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You must be thinking of yourself, the blacks. Gee, 99% for Obama. Do you think maybe they're voting based on skin color? Wouldn't that be racist? Oh...well...racism only applies to white apparently. when blacks vote based on skin color it's ok, right?

Comment_arrow

Jon

4:48 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

not saving anything with an out of wedlock birthrate pushing 70%,no fathers in the home to help raise and guide their kids, been passed by every ethnic group in the country in education and there by job oppurtunities,,doesnt have to be that way but for the most part it is

suz

2:36 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Sorry, but I believe that 50% of the people that voted for Obama just want free "stuff". God Bless this country for another 4 years!

Comment_arrow

Washed ashore

3:01 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

No silly. 95% of blacks voted for Obama which offset the 60% of whites who voted for Romney. If God Bless or in the case of Obama's reverend God Damn America is based on this polarization....we are damned. Vote for Democrats it beats working.

Mischa

2:38 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

True Story - You sound ridiculous. And by the way B.O. is only half-black and what's the difference? If you hate white people so much, then please move away. I for one, am not prejudice and don't appreciate your racist comments.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:53 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

+1 Mischa - there's an awful lot of racism in these threads. It's scary to know what people are REALLY thinking of me as they greet me with a smile in Shop Rite.

Dentss Dunnagun

2:56 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Democrats want to go back to the good old days when Fannie and Freddie were tools of both the Congress and the Administration. The Dems want the D.C. mortgage agencies to write off all underwater loans. The goal is to socialize the losses that borrowers are faced with.

Jimm

3:47 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Easy answer why I would not vote for Romney? " I pay 13% taxes" Now I'm retired and "only" pay 24% taxes on my pension that ONLY I contributed to since the government shirked it's responsibility... why does he get preferential treatment? Because of Congress and an obliging President back then made it a law!!!

Now its widely known and was reported by 60 Minutes that thousands of private corporations raided and depleted employees pensions in the 90's forcing them into Federally Insured Pension Corporation - like the FDIC, that had to make good using taxpayer money... There's your venture capitalists at work = Gordon Gekko's welfare for the rich "Greed is good"

Now when the rich are told to pay the 30% that private individuals pay today in taxes, do you hear the wailing? Cry me a river! That among other reasons is why Obama won.
I dont make %250K or even a tenth of that on pension, so I'm not better off either - but I'm not stupid enough to pick a venture capitalist who destroyed companies and sent jobs overseas unlike his opponent...
Nuff said!

Washed ashore

3:53 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Come on Jimm you don't pay 24% it's impossible unless your pension pays you $1 million a year. Show us the math and the tax brackets on how you calculate that. Is your pension invested? Then wouldn't you pay cap gains and dividend taxes of 15% tops just like Romney. Who cares, Mitt is back living the high life and you are still gonna complain about everything. Right now Mitt's getting his Ferrari detailed on his way to lobster dinner.

Prove you math otherwise you're just another poster fraud.

Washed ashore

4:01 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@Howard West - did you mean to forget that Clinton added 40% to the national debt during his 8 years and that the budget surpluses he had were a direct result of the GOP in 99/00? Did you mean to forget that? Did you also mean to forget that while Bush did spend money, his congresses both D and R controlled said it was OK. In fact, in 2007, the Dem's controlled both houses. They voted his budgets that led to the deficits.
Now look, I know excuses and blame are all you have but anyone with google can fact check. Obama voted for the budgets and spending. Heck in 2010 he passed the tax cuts - the Obama tax cuts that are budget busters.

Let me know what other facts I can enlighten you on. I know it won't change your vote nor the fact that Obama and Democrat policies never work - or why do we still have problems - but at least you will be honest.

Comment_arrow

Dom DeLouise

4:40 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

This 16 trillion national debt issue is a bit misleading. Yes, Obama has exploded the national debt, however by the sheer force of interest, the debt will rise exponentially with or without new issuance of treasuries (which is a pipe dream). This Country, imho, will NEVER implement a policy of paying down the national debt, even when our budgets were balanced back in the 90s this did not occur. National debt will keep hurtling out of control until we are unable to pay our debts as they become due (otherwise known as insolvency). At that time, we will utilize whatever military prowess we have remaining to invade yet another contury and/or battle with our creditors. This is inevitable.

Comment_arrow

Jimm

5:00 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed,
You have a interesting viewpoint - The budgets are introduced and passed by House & Senate then SIGNED into law or VETOED by the Prez... Executive Orders don't require Legislative approval til 90 days in case of war

Dubya got approval for war by claiming WMD... which was a lie he perpetrated and is currently under investigation by the Hague for... but he will never face trial like saddam hussein did - so sad. Google and fact check those facts - I already did.

President Obama signed the budgets int law, he didn't "vote" for any of them. Again fact checking... They were extensions of the Bush tax cuts approved by both houses of Congress...To not sign them would have placed this Country in default and put THOUSANDS of workers out of work costing millions of dollars losses to the economy.

Please enlighten me as to the base of your knowledge - I'm fascinated by the nitpicking but no acknowledgement of others views as possibly valid...

"Remember the round table is a 360 degree view"

Jimm

4:34 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed ashore ,
The Federal rate shedule for 2011. (copied from wikipedia)
Schedule Y-1 — Married filing Jointly or Qualifying Widow(er)
>$17,000 / < $69,000 taxed at $1,700.00 + 15% of the amount over $17,000

Wife makes 30K I make 22K = $52K.
Thats $1,700 + $5250 ($35000 X.15) = $6950 + NJ State income tax of $3100 - $10050 on $52,000 earnings... Federal 1040 return says my effective tax rate is 24% my calculations are just over 20% on both... your point is technically correct since I get deductions.
Wil you acknowledge my point though? I didnt complain, I pointed out he made his money gutting companies and shipping jobs out of America for 20 years, and using tactics like I stated above to improve "shareholders" pockets at the expense of taxpayers? That he then sheltered his millions offshore, paying below regular tax rates that were made possible by "buying" Congress and the President...

Make me laugh the CNN commentator got it dead right " They Spent 6 Billion Dollars For Status Quo"

Is that bitching?

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:01 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jimm you really are a moron and no doubt an unemployed loser sucking off the system. Luckily the successful people with a work ethic are paying for your food stamps and welfare. Conservative values will prevail Wait and see what an uninhibited Obama will bring. Then maybe you'll get it.

Washed ashore

4:47 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jimm you are a good man for sharing. First off, 52k in federal income tax would be gross. You subtract either std or itemized deductions plus exemptions to get to your AGI. AGI applies to the tax rate. Let's assume you took std ded and 2 exemptions, that would make your AGI 52k-12k std deduction-3800x2 for exemptions=32400 AGI.
Tax = 1700 plus 15%x15400 or 2310. Total Fed tax = 4k on 32400 = 12%

You added in state taxes but that doesn't count towards fed and you are comparing apples to oranges. Romney paid 14% Fed. I don't know what he paid in state.

I will not concede any such points. If the IRS thinks Mitt owes money, go collect it. If he does what the law allows and you don't like it, change the law.

Do you own an Apple phone or any product? Apple is the worlds most profitable company and they make their products overseas. Why not attack them for this and not paying their fair share. It's too easy to attack these things. The big picture gets cloudy. GM makes products overseas same as GE. They take advantage of tax loopholes. Fix the code. Eliminate the IRS. Make it a postcard. Save billions of expense and make more money

For the record, I don't think you should pay 4k in Fed taxes. Anyone under $40k can be exempt. That doesn't affect tax revenues that much. The problem is spending/

Comment_arrow

Jimm

5:17 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed ashore,
I'm not complaining about paying. I do not take any deductions which I'm not entitled and just because they make or have a law - does not mean its right. (example it was once ok to own slaves or work people to death in unsanitary conditions.)

I do not own any Apple product - exactly for that reason. I do my best to buy American made products and it is very difficult to do so. I am not one in favor of NAFTA / SALT trade agreements as we are giving away the farm - literally.

OUR Congress and Presidents (whether they are your flavor or not) got us into this mess. They have been bought and sold since the 60's. I try not to be a consipracist and stay in reality but find it hard to believe the defense industry didnt assasinate JFK over the coming Vietnam War.

I am speaking about reasonableness - I do not like Obama, but chose him over the "rich" and will do so every time. When Sheldon Adelman can toss 6 million dollars in one night into a Super-Pac, what choice do I have but to oppose him?

We are headed to a class war that Reagan started in 1980 when he said he was going to eliminate the middle class. and by God the conservatives have tried!

As long as I draw breath, those above me do not get my loyalty until they show some in return and we both know that isn't happening. "Better Dead than Red"

Gitt Tomley

4:50 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Nice Stock Market! Here comes the depression. Nice voting genius'!

Comment_arrow

Jimm

5:20 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Why THANK YOU Mitt, I mean Gitt!
As I don't own stock - who gives a fat cats *ss if you lose money there?

Works Mcgee

4:57 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yessssss!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4 more years that i won't have to work but will get unemployment the whole time without even looking for a job! Oh yeah, and food stamps! Yes we can! No job, no problem!

Washed ashore

5:28 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jimm you seem like one of the good guys and interested in facts. I wish more were like you. I agree with you on Apple but all of the people who own Apple are hypocrits. I own a GMC and a BMW made in South Carolina! Reasonable is a good word to use but how we define it is the problem. Let's agree that when the government spends 1 trillion a year more than it has, we have a spending problem ok? One way to balance the budget is to cut spending AND raise some money by taxing those including me who can pay more. I will gladly do it when the spending is cut. Today 10% pay 80% of all taxes. That is unfair! No one should put that much burden on someone else regardless of ability to pay. Many should not pay taxes and thats cool too but our problem is and has always been spending.

Obama won and good for him. America did not win. Some of America thinks they won. He did not win White America's support. He is not a leader. he is divisive. He has no solutions. Spending money we don't have doesn't solve problems. I am a problem solver. See the exchange I had with Howard. I am waiting for his list of cuts that are acceptable. Remember fair ? Let's get to work and solve some problems.

Comment_arrow

lawrence williard

5:34 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Incorrect, you are not a problem solver. You're a loser on the internet not making a difference. I can see how you were confused though.

Comment_arrow

GW

5:58 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Your opinion notwithstanding, there are many whites who voted for the president, and we do not consider ourselves citizens of "White America".

Jimm

5:38 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed ashore,
I AGREE we need to cap spending and what to cap is exactly the problem. Thats why I believe the viewpoint is whats most important.

We NEED to spend less but what reality do you live in when SIX B I L L I O N dollars was spent on elections? If I heard correctly it was 20 million for every single candidate per week for three months. . . Excessive? Ludicrous? For crying out loud!

Do you really think it was $5-$10 donations that got to that figure? I wonder what the salaries are for all those combined positions that caused six billion dollars to be spent on this year? Stop the Insanity! OK Rant over :)

Washed ashore

5:47 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@larryWillard - thanks for the insults. I find insults solve lots of problems. Thank you for your participation. I am still rich and you are still whatever you are. Jokes on you. BTW I made my business happen. I built that. My employees are non union and happy. We provide good benefits and we provide incentives for success. Every day I learn something from an employee and put it to use. Let us know when you have an original thought or solution. In the mean time, while we both posted, the Fed Government borrowed another 500 million dollars and spent it. Did you feel it? Was it helpful?

Washed ashore

6:10 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@nancyduggan yes lots of whites did vote for Obama. Why I will never understand but they did. Many others did too and he won. Again. Sadly.

What Obama did not do however is win the majority of white votes. I think the latest AP has winning maybe 40%. That is TERRIBLE. This is telling because it means whites do not support him or his policies. Why will he do to gain our trust? Maybe he doesn't care since he didn't need us. I hope he does. The majority of a group should be considered.

How can an incumbent President win election when only 40% of the largest voting block supports him?

He has much work to do.

I guess it would be fair to say Romney is the white people choice by 60-40!! That's HUGE!! Why do whites dislike Obama so much?

Bel Air - could it be your special phrase "racism" or perhaps something BIGGER like failed leadership, failed policies, no jobs, too much debt.

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

6:33 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed, if you look at the thread, you will see you brought up the word "racist", not I. I said I didn't have to call you anything, your words show who you are.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:11 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obama doesn't care about whites, even though he is half white. He is angry at white people and wants to take our money and re-distribute it to his people. He feels justified in doing this. He hates America and wants to change everything about this nation that has made it great. That's the CHANGE he wants. Funny though how he benefited from America. Got to go to college (if he would release any of this information) based on quota systems and grants for minorities. But just like the rich celebrities who have benefited the most from free enterprise and capitalism, he wants to destroy the very system that benefited him most. Sick!

Washed ashore

6:20 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Jimm be careful your pension is invested in the stock market.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

7:04 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Do you think someone like Jimm has investments? He's living off of us...remember? he doesn't pay taxes. He just has his hand out.

Comment_arrow

Jimm

8:14 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed ashore,
Your right -my pension is tangled in investments and would cost too much too change over. But I would consider it a small price to pay to watch all the Big Mouths lose thier McMansions when it happens. I have enough savings to offset the meltdown period.

Truth teller - I'm retired if you would actually read the posts, I worked my job for over two decades - put money away, took care of my family, paid my taxes and volunteered for my community? Did you? Or are you one of those wailers crying so loud that nobody questions you about your "truth" ... put up or shut up big man.

Comment_arrow

Truth teller

9:48 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Obviously a state pension...living off government.

Comment_arrow

Jimm

10:22 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Truth teller,
yeah thats right, except you didn't pay diddly towards my pension... I never missed a payment in 25 years but since 1992 when (R) Gov. Christie took $300M out of our pension fund so you pantywaists wouldn't have a tax increase...then never paid that back... AND in the 20 years since the State, County and local governments have not paid ONE single full payment into the pension fund. That left the employees to fund it themselves - thats right 5%- 7% of our salaries went into the pension ALONE. The GAO estimates the missed government payments worked out to over 2 BILLION dollars lost by the fund over the 20 years.

Now McFly thats truth - check the Newark Star Ledger for the article. And STFU
Its stupid people like you that I took out of burning houses cause they fell asleep cooking or were fighting with the spouse and tried to burn down the apt, cut the drunk fools out of thier cars and actually cared about helping older folks when they had thier heart attacks... Do us a favor and don't call 9-1-1 when you are hurt because you dont appreciate what we do for less money than an athlete, you willingly pay $100 for a ticket to a game but bitch about $15 in your taxes. you are the lowest kind of life form on Earth.

Washed ashore

6:38 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Bel Air I know how you Democrats operate. My words show who I am? Funny who am I? Well besides smart, successful, wealthy?

What Democrat policies have ever worked?

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

7:05 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Nah, I don't think you're any of those things.

Comment_arrow

Washed ashore

8:28 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What Democrat policies have ever worked?

Comment_arrow

KeepItReal

9:14 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What an asinine question "what Democrat[ic] policies have ever worked?" Are you really that arrogant to assert that NO policy espoused by Democrats has EVER worked? I won't dignify the question with an attempt to actually answer it.

Comment_arrow

HereWeGoAgain

10:57 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

BellairBerdan obviously gets off on stirrin' it up on this thread. Stop falling for it, folks.

re-tired

7:31 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

We need to cut all the b.s. out of these elections 2.2billion spent for what ! These two guys were both bought and payed for by the wealthy .There is no difference in who you selected neither one could solve our main problem .We have become a lazy society and think that we have a right to live on government subsidy and that we work for a union .Everything has to eventually crash in our debt ridden society and bring our living standards down to third world standards.We have no one to support the cost of all the pensions and health care costs unless the tax rate is 40% for everyone which would cause the revolution Trump called for.There is little hope for the future of America and we can`t continue down this path!

Comment_arrow

DennyD

7:39 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Any logic your post had was lost when you cite Trump. Read up about how you can claim bankruptcy more than one and pay workers 10 cents on the dollar and still own casinos and private jets. Trump is a piece of $hit.

Ron Mullen

9:16 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

reduce property taxes in montclair NOW

Washed ashore

9:24 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

@keepitreal - won't dignify LOL!! Because you can't!!

If Democrat policies work, then why do we still have poor, homeless, jobless, uneducated people? Wouldn't all the money spent have worked by now? In fact, the problems under Democrats only have gotten larger. I believe when something doesn't work over and over, that is called failure.

If they work, why aren't the problems solved?

Comment_arrow

Jimm

9:42 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Washed ashore,
By your statement hasnt EVERY policy implemented by Democrats, Republicans and whoever failed? We have had all of those problems listed since the dawn of time. The Greeks, Romans, Turks, societies all collapsed under thier own failed expectations. We are doomed to repeat our history if we don't learn from it.

The military had it right with the term "sick,lame and lazy" yet they could not solve the problem either. Who is legitimately sick, who is scamming the system, and who doesn't really give a dam*?
Churchill said that "persistence was the ability to go from one failure to another without the loss of enthusiasm" I don't consider him a loser... just my $.02

Will

9:58 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Yea, right... FORWARD!.....directly off a cliff.
The country is going to get exactly what it deserves...a more liberal progressive entitlement state that we need to borrow from China to sustain. No more Greatest Generations, only the entitlement generations ....ala Western Europe.
I feel very sorry for the younger generations that have to pay for all this...

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

10:06 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Actually China holds about 8% of our debt.

You feel sorry for the younger generations, but not sorry enough to raise the income tax 3% on the top 2% of wage earners.

Comment_arrow

LPR

10:08 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

I couldn't agree more. This is so regrettable. The consequence of this direction will be a blow for this country. Abortion and Gay marriage was of greater importance than our financial health. We have lost our way.

Comment_arrow

Washed ashore

10:25 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Bel Air what will that solve? Will it lower the $16 trillion debt? Why did your Savior spend money he didn't have when in 2008 he complained about the debt being irresponsible?

Are you saying you want to raise the 35% bracket 3% higher to 36%? Capital gains from 15 to 15.45%?

I'll pay more if you show me what raising this tax actually does to help the poor.

Will

10:24 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

yea, typical Obama Drone. Don't cut spending or question it....we need to raise taxes and just keep sending even MORE money to Washington DC. Because that's where all the brains are! They've done such a great job with our "investments"...Solyndra, Tesla...etc. Obama has no plan to bend the cost curve down. We have $60 Trillon in unfunded liabilities, but the Obama drones never challenge that. Oh,almost forgot, the $60T doesn't include the geniuses in DC managing our money with Socialized Medicine!! Remember, our President sold that to the American people as neutral to the deficit.....NOT!
We going to get what we sow.....we're the next Greece
Do you really believe that Govt.

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

10:35 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

You're funny Will. You're also a lil bit cray cray. You're going to have a miserable 4 years. Enjoy!

Jimm

10:43 pm on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Will,
I'll agree we need to stop spending more than we have. Do you mind cutting the Defense budget by a third? Can we stop the space program in its entirety? Those two items alone will save 900 million a year,

No? Actually I agree - we shouldnt, but how about free healthcare for every congressman and senator for life once thier elected? and a pension after just 6 years? They were both introduced by Republicans, and passed while we were asleep at the wheel. I dont know how much it has cost us but I think they should get obamacare just like us...

Jimm

1:36 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I have a few suggestions for reform and savings... No political office applicant can spend more than 50% of the yearly salary running for said office. Any donation or contribution counts against the total. (It'll never happen with S.C. decsion creating super-pacs but if they make it a law...) Exceeding total results in disqualification.

Congress must have 2/3rds majority for multiple purpose bills to pass. (keeps pork barrel prjects from being tacked onto bills)

Congress must work 240 8 hr days per year for thier salary... any days off are unpaid. All perks and benefits must be reported and taxed as income.

No Lobbyists will be entertained by Congressmen or Senators, only residents and businesses of thier district. No gratuities of any kind can be accepted, violators will be disqualifed.

Any money earned (speaking engagements etc.) while employed as a Senator/Congressmanwill be turned into the employer.

Now feel free to add on - its a great fantasy, but not too likely unless America pushed for accountability of elelcted officials.

None of the above propsals would stop officials from doing thier job - but the exit-stage right would be hilarious!

Comment_arrow

Jon

1:44 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jimm for POTUS! Jimm for POTUS!

Comment_arrow

Jon

4:31 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Boeing did nt wait long annouced layoffs today,

FairLawn soccer mom

4:50 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Jimm good stuff. No pensions or benefits for congress or any local government official.

Will cutting the defense budget increase unemployment? Where will all the military personnel work? What about all the people at Lockheed and on the bases?

Are you ok with firing all of them?

If we cut defense by 1/3 will you cut entitlements by 1/3?

FairLawn soccer mom

5:21 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43698-Nov-MBR.pdf

tax revenues rose by 6.4% in 2012 over 2011

Defense spending was down 4%

Despite that, the government borrowed another $1 trillion to spend pushing the national debt over $16 trillion.

In contrast, outlays for the two largest entitlement programs—Social Security and Medicare—rose by $43 billion (or 6 percent) and $16 billion (or 3 percent),
respectively. Social Security’s growth rate was similar to that in recent years; Medicare’s growth rate was significantly below the roughly 7 percent average
annual rate for the past five years.

Eric P

8:34 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I think we've reached a tipping point with this election. I suspect BHO will be able to nominate at least two SCOTUS justices in the coming four years, pushing the Court well to the left. The President's Eurocentricism is evident. Our existing European style unemployment rate and debt load are the new normal. Get used to it, because the President thinks that what they should be. De facto one party rule will be in place for at least a generation. Half the country will welcome it, at first.

BellairBerdan

9:47 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Keep whining loser(s). It makes me smile :D

Make sure you double down on the crazy for the next election!

Sandy

9:58 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

BARACK OBAMA FORGETS NEW JERSEY

Jimm

10:16 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I was watching CNN today, Its pretty clear - Obama wins 71% of Latino/Hispanic vote, 92% of Black vote and over 60% of "other minorities"
Obama ended up with 51% of total votes. The Hispanic guest pointed out the anticipated minority vote will rise to 55% of the total vote in 2016 making a 3% increase in voters likely to vote democrat in 2016. He noted Republicans were going to have the dinosaur's choice, "adapt or die"...

Comment_arrow

George Clark

10:41 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

are you saying, like most republican losers, that obama appealed to the majority and the disinfrangised,oops, minorities and therefore was a better representative of the majoritory of the people? if so, then why would you dislike that? Because you wanna be a slave owner of stupid blacks, mexican dumb people in your society? yes, is only the honest anwer so kill yourself kings.

George Clark

10:46 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Republicans and all people of this world do have a choice. adapt or die. The winner takes all, stand of :"civilizaed modern mand", will be the end of mankind. you have your choice. Make it know if your vainity allows. I double dog dare you in this dog eat dog world. Bite the hands that feed you. i'd rather die a man then a rat or a dog. how about you chosen few?

Waldo

11:31 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Investors really excited by election results, equities down 3% in 2 days. Companies showing their confidence by laying off thousands (Boeing, Ericsson, and Pepsi) AFTER the election. The private sector unemployment rate keeps rising while the public sector unemployment rate remains lower AND more people on the state and fed roles today than 4 years ago. The private sector is shrinking and gov't is getting bigger. Democrat or Republican, your kids entering college now or who have just graduated have a big problem. Their employment opps have shrunk because the private sector has lost confidence and refuses to invest in the current setup (Obamacare was/is the thing that really pushed/es them over the edge). This used to be known as tax and spend, it now is spend and choke. That said, Republicans are out of touch with younger voters and ignore minorities-they need a lesson in out-reach. The sat two candidates were regrettably poor choices. The two party system is ripe to be broken.

FairLawn soccer mom

11:39 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

BA BS - Yeah we're losers when your policies don't work, people still have no jobs and too much debt. You are probably that parent that thinks all kids should get a trophy just for showing up. Only you can see highlights in failure.

Jimm

11:51 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

As I have said above, Obama is not a good answer...but my other choice is a "businessman" who at the head of Bain Capital there were three instances in the 90's where his company "advised" boards to raid the pensions of employees then after the money was paid in dividends and bonuses, they declared bankruptcy and the employees money was gone and they were forced into the Federal Pension Guaranty Corp (like FDIC for your bank accounts). Now WHO legally stole money from people and didnt go to jail?
This is the same guy that proudly states he only pays 13% and won't pay more because he doesnt have to? His money is kept offshore to avoid taxes and you consider this Presidential material? The business system is broken, the Pols have been bought for over the past 50 years. It doesn't matter anyway - the "white flight" out of our cities are coming back to bite us... look at where Obama won and he carried the majority - its only going to get bigger. It will probably be a class war before 2016 because this gridlock isnt going away... IT DOES NOT MATTER either way, cry me a river - we all lose one way or another. hang on for the ride its gonna be ugly!

FairLawn soccer mom

12:00 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Yeah Jimm he doesn't pay more taxes than he has to. Duh! Are you joking. Who pays more than they have to? Did you send in a few extra bucks this past quarter with your tax bill?

And how does one legally steal exactly? It's either legal or its not. I believe that's an oxymoron like Jumbo Shrimp. If you get a pension paid for by my tax dollars, that is legally stealing from me isn't it. No one asked me if it was ok to steal my money call it a tax and give it to you. You are right. it will get ugly. you know who will lose our children who cannot get a job or pay back the $20 trillion in debt they have inherited from a bunch of failing policies that don't fix anything. I plan on posting daily updates on the improvements Obama has made in the lives of the poor. It will probably be a bunch of short stories showing failure.

Comment_arrow

Jimm

12:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Ok Fairlawn, Read my posts above, YOU taxpayers have not paid into the NJ pension system since (R) Gov Christie WHITMAN in 1992!!! Check the Newark Star Ledger for the story... I worked over 25 yrs and NEVER missed a payment into the pension... The matching funds WERE NOT paid by local,county or state governments each year because Legislature and the Gov (both Parties) wrote a law giving thmeselves a pass. According to the GAO in 1997 the Taxpayer contributions ran out... understand that? RAN OUT. The Pension is owed the equivalent of TWO BILLION dollars from the missed +20 years payments and interest due... Gov Christie has snowballed you into thinking its your money and were stealing it. WRONG its our money! between 5% & 7% of our pay goes into the pension and we have to pay 25 years or become disabled to get it. NOT YOU, Not ov Christie. Again read the article- its online and available. its true - so educate yourself and please stop saying lies.

FairLawn soccer mom

12:22 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jim that is a lie!! Every quarter that I pay my property taxes, a large share of that goes to pay for pension expenses. In addition, my state income tax and sales taxes go to the state to pay for pensions. In Christies budget this year, $1.2 billion is being paid into the pension system. Is all of this tax money going someplace else?

Why don't you explain where the past governors mostly Dumbocraps would have gotten the money to pay into the pension? Were they supposed to raise our taxes even more or cut school aid?

Every dollar I have to pay for someone else's benefits is stealing from me. That is my money. I pay for my own healthcare and my own retirement and you should do the same.

I see you live in Gloucester Twp let's look at their budget shall we

http://www.glotwp.com/pdfs/etc/introduced2012budget.pdf

Page 28 (sheet 19) shows a $4.95 million expense for pensions. Who is paying for this expense if not me and the taxpayers? And yes, this number is net of what employees pay.

So little ol GT spends over 10% a year just on pensions. Tax revenues are $37.5 million so pensions represent more than 14% just on pensions.

Where's that money come from Jimm? My taxes.

Let's ask the Delphi workers how their pensions worked out when Obama stole it from them....what do you have to say about that?

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/stephenkruiser/delphi-pension-scandal-a-story-that-should-be-bigg

Comment_arrow

Jimm

12:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Lying? Afraid not - look closer... The Glo Twp government COLLECTS employees contributions and sends them to the State Pension board, WHERE do you read that in Glo Twp's budget? Its the 5%- 7% of salaries withheld that they are sending to Trenton. Look in the same budget and look at credits... the didn't collect ANY pension funds from the employees? Not even close to the truth. Your $4.95M includes EVERY employee contribution , I was responsible and knew what had to be paid quarterly to the pension board as part of my job. We (NOT Glo Twp.) had over 100 people and our quarterly payments were more than $250,000 to the pension board. Thats a million dollars a year and there was NO municipal contribution in 2006, 2007 or 2008 confirmed by the business administrator because the law was passed by Legislature and Guv Corzine giving them the pass. Thats what got my curiosity and made me research it.
Try reading this; http://blog.nj.com/njv_johnbury/2009/06/no_hope_in_dopes_fixing_nj_pen.html

FairLawn soccer mom

1:20 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

You are not lying? Ok, let's take a look

Lie #1 - every dollar in the GT budget for pensions is employee contributions?
FACT - Do the math Jimm - Out of a $40M budget, police salaries equal $12M and at 7% contribution, that would equal $840K yet the Police Pension contribution (all employer by the way) is $2.5M. Is $2.5M larger than $840K? Employee contributions do not go into the township's official budget.

Lie #3 - The matching funds WERE NOT paid by local,county or state governments each year because Legislature and the Gov (both Parties) wrote a law giving thmeselves a pass.

http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/pensions/annrpt2011/statistical.pdf

check out page 4 - employee and employer contributions are listed by year....how can there be any if as you put it "WERE NOT" paid. Tax dollars pay for employer contributions and were almost $1 B in 2011.

If in 2006, 07 and 08 GT chose not to that was on them. I am sure they had to make it up later with more of my tax dollars.

Lie #2 - "YOU taxpayers have not paid into the NJ pension system since (R) Gov Christie WHITMAN in 1992!!!"
FACT - 2013 budget funds the State’s pension contribution at $1.1 billion, up from the $484 million paid into the fund during fiscal year 2012 – the largest payment in New Jersey history.

Where did this $1.5 billion come from? Our taxes!

Comment_arrow

Spooner

1:45 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Not to belabor the point since they closed the thread: but your $800B annual expense argument ignores human nature. As you pointed out, and I picked up on...expenses continued to climb while revenue fell... what was it about $400B, meanwhile they were funding TARP and ARRA for was it about $1.3T. . .And don't give me the party vote rhetoric. . .they were all milking the system before the collapse, with their earmarks and pet projects. . .spending like drunken sailors! Deficits didn't matter then?

Comment_arrow

Jimm

1:47 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

LOL - ok you KNOW everything - The employees and the employer MATCH funds, This only goes back to 2002 -I said 1992 (R) Gov. Christie Whitman TOOK $300 million from the Pensions and never paid it back, they also did not make thier payments - did you read your own posting? 2002 the Police and Fire Pension is over $1B yes billion in the red and 2003 they're $-79M yes negative 79 million -umm that means NO contribution, THEY took money out instead.... <smile> Gee could those extra dollars now be replacing those funds? Nahhh I didnt think so either!
http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/pensions/annrpt2011/statistical.pdf

Finally - Ms. Conservative I didnt work for GT, but you didnt pay ANY taxes for my pension, "our" taxes would only go to state workers... The town I did work for was supposed to match it. The Pensions are only supposed to administrate it - NOT steal it!
I pay the same taxes you do, I own my home and am not delinquent in my taxes, so can't I complain I'n double taxed on the same money? Or would you rather have No Police, No Fire, No Garbage, No sewer, No Streets Dept? I pay my taxes and think I get pretty good services for them - its high but I appreciate what others do for me and my neighbors. I'm not crying about paying even after I retired...you are.

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:25 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm - sounds like you have a beef with your town. Why did they not fund the pensions? Where did the money that was collected from taxpayers go if not to the pensions? Was it investigated? If someone stole, put them in jail.

How do you get a negative contribution? This isn't Washington. We only deal in positive numbers in NJ. Maybe they overpaid the year before and it was credited? What I see when I add up the column is $5 B of contributions for the police fund. That came from property taxes. $5 B is a lot of money except for DC where it is about 1/2 day's spending.

Anyway bottom line is towns contribute to the pensions just like employees and that is from prop taxes which are sky high. The state paid $1.5 B last 2 years from other taxes. Money that could have gone to hire teachers or police in Camden but were not available since they have to go to pensions.

Let's put it on the ballot - Do NJ Taxpayers want to continue to pay high property, sales and income taxes to fund the pensions of our government employees?

Do you think it will pass? I say 65%

Jimm

1:27 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Or better yet read this;http://blog.nj.com/njv_guest_blog/2012/02/what_gov_chris_christies_budge.html

I dont really care if you believe it, the Legislature & Guv passed the laws and it cannot be recovered once the following years budget is passed. but I well know how it feels to be screwed over by government of both colors...just dont be so sure you are on the right side (whichever it is) they both cheat lie and steal...

BTW: Delphi? The NON UNION employees got screwed? Gee you pay 1% of your salary, you get union membership and look what happens - your pension is covered... sheesh thats hard to figure out, those poor, poor employees who wouldnt pay for the protections of a union got screwed because Delphi shareholders gave the top bosses too much money for years beforehand while NOBODY did anything?

As I read it Obama kept the company afloat - it should have been allowed to sink under the waves for mismanagement. That IS his fault - the Auto Bailout should never have happened.

FairLawn soccer mom

1:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm I don't believe it because its not true. My town has always paid our town's expense which my tax dollars pay for. If corrupt GT has been doing something sneaky or illegal, call the authorities. The pension contributions are set by state law. We both know the state didn't kick in its share for many years. What choice did they have? Was there extra money lying around? Either pay the pensions or cut school aid or something else. unlike DC, it has to balance.

The pension system is a fraud and should be eliminated. In 2012, towns, counties and the state will contribute over $2.2 B to pensions. Get rid of the pensions and let employees take care of themselves and viola $2.2 B of immediate tax relief. There is a $30 B unfunded liability that taxpayers are on the hook for. Kill it now!

If the pensions were gone, GT could spend that $5M on services that benefit residents or the poor instead of paying for pensions.

Here's the 2011 GT audit. The Township applied for and received approval from the Local Finance Board to defer a portion of the 2009 liability due for both PERS and PFRS.

http://www.glotwp.com/pdfs/etc/GloucesterTwpAudit11.pdf

What I really like is on page 47....over $9M for unpaid absences. Criminal!! Do yuo think taxpayers should pay for this? If you work you get paid, if you are sick you get paid. If you work you don't get paid for also not being sick. Double dipping. No benefit to the taxpayer

Jimm

1:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Ok your killing me - THE money put into the Pension by the employees? What happens to that?
It was a G-D LAW that made me put my money in the Pension board. I didn't CHOOSE that!
I had to sign an agreement with the pension board in order to accept my job. I took the civil service test passed it, went to work when I was supposed to, stayed home when I was sick, got promoted for doing my job right, and now after 25 years - YOU, who never went where I did, never got exposed to AIDS patients, never fought a fire, never had to deal with a suicidal person or an elderly person who was dying... YOU think I should just hand it over so you dont have to pay your share of an agreement thats a LAW? O M G shallow people!

Comment_arrow

Jimm

2:07 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

You really have me fired up now... you still havent answered the question of what happens to MY money in the Pension?
Try this analogy - you may understand it better what your suggesting...
If someone walks into a bank and makes a deposit every month for 25 years and then goes into the bank to start taking out the money but is told by the bank "Sorry - were not going to honor our agreement to pay you interest on your account, as a matter of fact we're going to take your money and keep it... How long do you think that bank would be in business, or someone not going to jail?

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:15 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm - the pension is funded by 3 sources
1. Employees (deducted from pay)
2. Employers (paid by prop taxes)
3. State (paid by income, sales and other taxes)

You said taxpayers were not funding it. It's not true. We do. And it costs plenty....too much actually.

My wife works for a hospital. Her pension was closed a decade ago because it was unaffordable. What does that have to do with burdening taxpayers? Should taxpayers pay for all nurses pensions or just gov employees? I congratulate you for doing your job and getting promoted etc but that doesn't mean I need to pay taxes for your benefits over my own.

Lot's of contracts are voided. I owned GM stock and bonds and when Obama bankrupted them, I lost my investments. My bond note said I owned the company but Obama said not any more.

Delphi has a contract and like them or not, they got screwed

Bottom line is who is paying and can they afford it. Obama wants more money. Local governments and states want more money for pensions. Everyone wants more money for what they want to spend it on What about the rest of us who don't get taxpayer funded benefits and pensions?

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:30 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

What happens to your money is you get it back and then you are in charge of it. It's how it works. When my wife's hospital closed the plan, that's what they did. The actuaries calculate it. It's very simple.

I get your analogy about following the rules and paying in and then how can someone take it away. I don't want to take it away. I want to give it back to you.

Let me flip it around, I have paid 14% into Social Security for 30 years (I am self employed). I have 15 to go to receive benefits. SS promised me when I started I would get benefits at 62, then they moved it to 65 and now higher. Aren't they doing what you are afraid of? I will never get back from SS what I even put in.

FairLawn soccer mom

1:56 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Hi Spooner - this could be the first spill over thread. Yes they ALL were milking the system but the earmarks and other stuff while bad don't add up to very much.
From 2008 to 2012 entitlement spending increased by $500B. That's not earmarks.
From 09 to 10, welfare spending rose $211 B in one year. That's not earmarks
The TARP and ARRA are not included in the budgets. They were separate appropriations.
Here is the 2010 summary
• $2.173 trillion (+14.9%)
o $695 billion (+4.9%) – Social Security
o $571 billion (+58.6%) – Unemployment/Welfare/Other mandatory spending
o $453 billion (+6.6%) – Medicare
o $290 billion (+12.0%) – Medicaid
o $164 billion (+18.0%) – Interest on National Debt
plus gov ops and defense of $1.2. That gets you to $3.4T

TARP and ARRA not in there. the numbers in Paran represent year over year increases.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

soccer mom- you and others seem to be fixated on the term entitlement. . .so tell me: when someone takes out an auto insurance contract and they sustain an injury, you expect medical costs to be paid under PIP insurance. The same, if you damage property and have collusion coverage...insurance pays. If someone takes out a life insurance policy naming you as beneficiary...you expect to collect. . .why is that?

Those "entitlements" are the insurance contracts as auto and life insurance. The state is bound by law to comply with it's agreement. You and others are continuously trying to spin "entitlement" as a welfare give away. . .it is not!

PS: show where the cost of Bush's two wars are in the budget too. . ..also I'm looking for defense spending in 2013 proposed budget. . .can't seem to find it...is it listed under Security?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/tables.pdf

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

11:34 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Hi Spooner - entitlement is the term the government and CBO uses.
Your example makes no sense. if I PAY for insurance then whatever coverage I paid for I should receive. The difference is PAYING for something that you expect to get in return. Yes, people pay into SS and Medicare and they expect to get something back. I know I do but the facts are SS and Medicare are deficit busters. The taxes paid don't cover the expenses. No one is entitled to more than they pay in are they so how come it is so?
In the budget, defense spending includes the wars etc under security. In 2013 defense spending. Under S4, defense spending in 13 is projected to go down 9 billion.
as you now see the 2013 spending level of 3.65 T dwarfs the 2008 spending. The difference isn't the wars or TARP or ARRA. It's just more spending mostly towards Medicare, SS, Medicaid, Welfare etc. all called entitlements.
The Govt under Obama and the Congress has simply continued to spend more money that we take in and the growth of the spending in dollars has accelerated the past 4 years. I know you are looking for the reduction in war spending. Me too right. You would expect the budgets to drop. They don't 1Who could ever justify more spending that they know is unpaid for?

look at the summary under mandatory - 2.2 T up 140B since 2011. That's annual spending it doesn't go down. just up. And its on borrowed funds

FairLawn soccer mom

2:03 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm my taxes are too high. All my taxes. Property, state, sales, etc. Eliminating pensions doesn't eliminate services so your standard comment about not wanting those things doesn't apply. Sure I want those and we pay hefty taxes for the services. I can't figure out how taxpayers benefit from paying pensions. In fact, if eliminated, it would allow us to receive more services for our money. Pensions don't police the streets, pick up trash or answer the phones. We pay salaries and darn high ones at that. Retirement planning isn't the taxpayers responsibility. That is what the nanny state wants but I reject it. I will pay for my retirement and you can pay for yours. Sound fair? When we eliminate the pensions, everyone will thank us for tax relief and getting more services! WIN WIN

Comment_arrow

Jimm

2:19 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Fairlawn,
Who in thier right mind is going to take a job where there is a high risk of injury, sickness or death with no retirement/pension for thier families? Your "businesses" already gutted the private pensions and took that money in the 90's. Now 20 years later they are going after the public ones?
Take a really close look at your tax bill - my schools are 58% of my total tax bill. Thats where the problem lies IMHO. I love the teachers but we do not need a superintendent for each town and Principals for each grade and vice principals for each class... Every student gets diagnosed with some disorder that was called laziness in my youth and solved by a kick in the pants, not "Special Classes". We have two school boards and multiple schools - over 25 administrators making over 100K and several teachers making over 100K Supers go for $250K or more each.

Lets have ONE superintendent per County, one Principal per school and get back to basic 3R's. our per pupil cost is over $8K!!!! Stop the insanity! I dont mind teachers making $80K, but if your snotty brat can't function - keep him home and school him there - its poppa's and momma's problem not mine.

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm another classic union arguement. There are 23 million unemployed. Those jobs would be filled in no time for the exact same pay, healthcare and no pension. Pensions get eliminated because they are unaffordable ponzi schemes. If they weren't why are they all underfunded? Why does the PBGC bail them out? Lots of towns high replacements with different benefits with no problem. If someone doesn't want to take the job and the risks, they can feel free to go someplace else. Great thing about America isn't it. No where does it say if the gov employee is unhappy, taxpayers need to make them happy.
I agree with you on the schools and the biggest cost of that is pay and benefits. No we don't need all those administrators and nonsense but that is not the problem. It's benefits. Pensions and healthcare. look up your local budget and see how much it swallows.

Thanks for the back and forth.

Jimm

2:27 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

3. State (paid by income, sales and other taxes) W H E R E is this coming from?

I DID the freakin job, I sent the money to Trenton, I read the laws! NOWHERE is the general treasury giving money for pensions - the State makes contributions for State employees, just like Counties and municipalities do, but there is NO line item in the state budget where the General Treasury just assigns money - it HAS to be done by Legislature & Gov - That is the law today!

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I don't understand your point above - you mentioned the state has not contributed to the pension which was mostly true until recently. The state's contribution is funded from income, sales and other taxes. The state pays for the teachers pensions too. Look at your local school budget. Where is the big teacher pension expense? It's not there. Wonder why?

I do understand you did the job and we should honor your agreement if you are already in retirement or close to it when you cannot make other plans. We have to deal with the future. Pick an age and we cut it off. Point is that is the answer. We need to work out the details.

Jimm

2:39 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Fairlawn,
I couldn't agree with you more on the SS point... I'm in the same boat - I cant apply even though I have 41 years of paying SS becaue I took the 25 yr opt out with the pension - I was getting too dam* old to do the job. I gotta wait 5 more years to get to 62. Yes I started working and earned enough for credit when I was 16 yrs old...

Jimm

2:55 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Fairlawn,
Do me a favor? click on reply at the bottom of the latest comment because I cant reply to your statement and its starting to look like I'm having a conversation with myself...LOL

Comment_arrow

FairLawn soccer mom

2:59 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm I try but sometimes it won't let me. LOL
I'm signing off for now. thanks for the exchange.

Jimm

2:56 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Now why were the private pensions underfunded? They were not. Remember we started the good days back in the mid 90''s. Bush-I and the Congress changed the accounting formula used for pensions at the request of big business... I know it kills you to hear this, but it became as ASSET of the company with the change, now it was available for the comptroller/treasurer to use this ASSET in the company bottom line... The first thing they did was reward themselves for suddenly having a great bottom line...Shareholders and Management looked fabulous unless you looked past the shareholder report...Millions were awarded to rich and with no regard to what happened next...thats somebody elses problem... Now a couple years later they no longer have a rosy bottom line and they start looking for a white knight, along comes Bain Capital, the company assets are strained and the pieces are worth more than the whole. Company closes and workers no longer have a viable pension - they get thrown to the Pension Guaranty Corp and US taxpayers are now on the hook for millions more... It takes Congress a decade to wake up to this, and now its to late, THOUSANDS of company pensions have been siphoned off and Billions of dollars are in some smug "corporate raider" pocket who sent the jobs to whoever will work for $.40 an hour... Which is why we now have lead in our paint and item after item getting recalled from Made in China.. sigh very simplistic but real.

Jimm

3:07 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Those jobs would be filled in no time for the exact same pay, healthcare and no pension.

Really? I had an employee retire and the town had enacted a new salary structure because of tightening budgets... We interviewed 15 off the list before someone would accept the employment package, several really good candidates passed because they were eith making more money already or found other towns paying more... where your short sighted is I had one FTP position to fill -thats one 40 hour position per week. I have ot offer OT first before I could hire outside contractors ( surrounding towns employees who worked flat rate. One of my employees took a ton of overtime and double shifted constantly... He started getting more time off for the hours he was working and now I had 1.3 FTP to start filling as he started taking his time off too. Now I was hiring two positions on some shifts and even at flat rate - two salaries cost me more than the original vacancy! it took over three months to get the person trained so we could put him on the street. we ended up spending 1.7 FTP for those 9 months, not even counting the accumulated time off the retired person earned which pushed the final cost over 2.2 FTP! it took 3 months for someone to get hurt after that and we started all over again until he could come back to work - and it was a legitimate injury No B.S.

Comment_arrow

BellairBerdan

6:56 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Jimm, just an FYI "FairLawn soccer mom" is the same person as "washed ashore" and "BelareBirden" and a I'm sure a few other troll names on here.

mary

8:29 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

REALITY CHECK LOOK TO YOUR RIGHT & THEN TO YOUR LEFT............YOU ARE NO LONGER THE MAJORITY. MINORITIES ARE THE MAJORITY!!!! IF YOUR PARTY DOESN'T EMBRACE THAT & MAKE SOME CHANGES YOU MAY NEVER HAVE A VICTORY AGAIN..........STOP THE HATE & WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

9:44 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Really?
I guess the US Census has it wrong when it lists whites as being 72.4% of the population.
Even removing the people that identify themselves as hispanic-white, you still have 63.7% of the population identified as White( European descent)

Maybe you should give them a call and let them know they made a mistake.

Michelle

9:10 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Until the GOP and its supporters open their eyes and realize that it is the over the top anger and venom that has and still is being displayed sent me and many others who may have otherwise been conviced to stay, fleeing to the other side. no I am not on welfare, no I am not itching to be the first in line free birth control or any other insult you want to hurl at half of the country who voted for the President. Even after losing the anger and venom is at an all time high and the insults at those who voted for the president just underscore how OUT OF TOUCH many in the opposition are with what could have been a STRONG base for them. It is sad, and the keep this rhetoric up, they will lose again in 4 years. Wake up - because hate, anger, fear induced rants only served to do you in in the end, when you could have EASILY won this race. Your desperation to win at all costs got in your own way. Shaking my head at the blinders that many of you refuse to take off.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

10:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Michelle, I see you're point. It was so refreshing to not see the left insult Romney for being Mormon. Or the New Black Panther party hangin around voting locations harrasing white voters (as they also did in 2008).
Did you know that Playboy published an article by a guy named Guy Cimbalo that he titled: The Hate F*ck List
Michelle Malkin
Megyn Kelly
Mary Katharine Ham
Amanda Carpenter
Elisabeth Hasselbeck
Dana Perino
Laura Ingraham
Pamela Geller
Michele Bachmann
Peggy Noonan
A few commnets he made about them
Michelle Malkin: “This highly f*ckable Filipina”

On Mary Katharine Ham: “You get this one pregnant, she stays pregnant. Karma’s a b*tch, isn’t it?”

What fantasy land do you live in?

Comment_arrow

Michelle

10:17 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Now we are quoting PLAYBOY as a political source? It's playboy for God's sake. They demoralize women of all races, creeds, political affiliations -- the only criteria is that you have breasts and a V. I did not know that, but then again, i don't subscribe to Playboy, so there you go. Gimme a break.

Comment_arrow

FourScore

10:29 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Here’s the difference mtwnres; only those on the radical fringe of the left made an issue of Romney’s religion, while prominent Morris County republicans actually attended prominent birther Jerome Corsi’s seminar earlier this year, and actually stated that there was something to his claim that Obama’s birth certificate was fake (never mind the number of Hawaiian officials that authenticated it).

This is the problem…. the GOP has to separate itself from the idiots and charlatans, and get serious. How many conservatives actually held out hope concerning Donald Trump’s “big announcement”???

Comment_arrow

BelareBurden

10:31 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

60% of white voters disagree with Obama
60% of married men disagree with Obama
53% of married women disagree with Obama
56% of seniors disagree with Obama
52% of men disagree with Obama
66% of voters who cared about the deficit disagree with Obama
52% of voters who cared about the economy disagree with Obama

95% of Blacks agree with Obama
71% of Hispanics agree with Obama
60% of mainly unemployed 19-29 years olds agree with Obama

Looks more like the same old same old battle of the producers and the takers.

President Obama’s tactical victory is clear when you look at the election returns. He has no grand mandate that comes out of Tuesday’s numbers. He has been re-elected, but his policies did not win the day. Voters didn't turn their faces up to the vision he painted the way they did in 2008. When voters were asked which candidate had a vision for the future, Romney won that question in exit polls, 55 percent to 43 percent. Asked about Obama's signature achievement, health care, voters did not approve. Forty-nine percent said they wanted it repealed in part or whole. Voters also said the federal government was too large.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

11:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Hookerman - "Prominent Morris county republicans" That's a joke right ?
I suppose people across the country are following the daily goings on of
"Prominent morris county republicans" ?

“Romney wants to let the—he said in the first 100 days, he’s going to let the big banks once again write their own rules,” “Unchain Wall Street.
They’re going to put y’all back in chains.”
Joe Biden

Mitt Romney “is not the face of Mormonism,” he has “sullied” his faith.
“He’s coming to a state where there are a lot of members of the LDS Church,” “They understand that he is not the face of Mormonism.”
Harry Reid ( also a Mormon) attacking Romney on his religious faith.

MSNBC accusing Romney of following a faith invented to protect infidelity
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/larry-odonnell-again-attacks-romneys-religion-mormonism-invented-excuse-infidelity

Should I keep going ?

O.J

10:40 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I like statistics, especially how you can manipulate it to make an argument. Except, most of the times people use only look at small and broad samples to come up with a conclusion. In this case, its used along with some racial bias. I would be slightly more inclined to entertain it more, if say it shows a census of how many White voters there are versus how many of them voted, then correlate that as a percentage of the whole White population in the country, then placing that as a percentage of the Total population of the country. I'm sure you'll find that your 60% is actually 30%.

BelareBurden

10:54 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Exit poll data is manipulation? News to me.

the Center for the Study of the American Electorate, put 2012 voter turnout at 57.5% of all eligible voters, compared to 62.3% who voted in 2008 and 60.4% who cast ballots in 2004. In 2000, the turnout rate was 54.2%.

The group estimated 126 million people voted in the election, where President Barack Obama defeated GOP nominee Mitt Romney. That means 93 million eligible citizens did not cast ballots.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/obama-virginia-2012-urban_n_2093546.html

Guess this snapshot disproves how the population centers handed victory to Obama.

mtwnres

11:09 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

And what sources are you getting your info from ?

So you just ignore the other examples.
I suppose you were just as outraged at the left 4 years ago when they dragged Sarah Palin ( and her daughter) through the mud ?
Including Obamas campaign manager scolding Palin for not staying home to take care of her family ? I guess he feels women belong at home in the kitchen.
Or these people on the left sending tweets to Sarah Palin calling her daughter a slut and mking fun of her son with DS.
http://twitchy.com/2012/06/28/left-attacks-sarah-palins-slut-daughters-and-retard-son-after-she-tweets-about-scotus-ruling/

Can you feel the tolerance and love on the left ?

Comment_arrow

Michelle

11:41 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

I see you edited this to remove the ironic and contractictory insult you hurled at me. but deleting it doesn't mean you never said it. How rude you are. It is telling that the exacmples of hate you give are quotes from smutty playboy and thinsg that happened not in this election but in the last. You seem to be a bit clueless in this respect..

Comment_arrow

Michelle

11:42 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Obama is a communist, he is a terrorist, he is a muslim, he has has a secret pact with russia, he is not an american, he is going to turn america in a communist country, into a socialist country. our number one agenda is to make him a 1 term president (not to help rebuild the country?), 47% of americans are lazy, feel entitlted to a home, healthcare, handouts and that the goverment ows them something, 47% dont pay taxes so who cares about them (you insult half the country and then are suprised that they don't vote for you?), women who voted for romney just want free birth control, black who voted for romney just did it because they are black, even colin powel who worked under BUSH is too stupid to vote intelligently so if he supports obama it is only because he is black, women can't get pregnant if they are raped, barack obama needs to go back to kenya, I mean i can go on and on. I am by no means saying that the democrats have halos over their heads and never said any thing untwart. What I am saying is that the constant rhetoric for 4 years non stop and at such a high decible that the core message, if the republicans had one, got lost in the sea of all that hate and venom. You will beleive and feel what and how you want, but what i am telling you and others is until you calm down and refocus and tone it down, and try to get in touch - you will continue to lose. period.

Comment_arrow

mtwnres

1:02 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I guess you missed me writing this:

"just as outraged at the left 4 years ago "

4 years ago would be the 2008 election. Learn to read .

Comment_arrow

Michelle

1:09 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

if you werent so busy editing your posts after the fact, thereby deletingthe replies to them, maybe I would be better able to follow your posts. Hard to read something that isn't there until after you get a reply that you don't like and try to hide it by deleting your thread and reposting it in a different way. You are so outraged at women on the left being insulted in a sexist way that you in turn throw sexist insults at another woman just because she has a different opinion than you. Stop being so disingenuous. You are so sadly contradictory and clueless that it is almost unfair to try to continue a dialouge with you.

FourScore

11:18 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Well, it looks like GOP leaders are now backpedaling on their hard-line immigration approach. They’re finally catching on.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/8/boehner-says-house-will-act-immigration-bill/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

FairLawn soccer mom

11:46 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Spooner and all - thought you might find this interesting.

http://taxfoundation.org/blog/cbo-federal-healthcare-spending-will-exceed-discretionary-spending-2016

The chart below shows projected federal spending on healthcare under current law over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Medicare will almost double over the next decade, from $550 billion this year to $1.064 trillion in 2022. Medicaid will more than double, from $253 billion this year to $592 billion in 2022. The biggest growth is in other mandatory healthcare programs, mainly the new Obamacare exchanges and subsidies, which are due to grow from $25 billion this year to $181 billion in 2022.

In total, healthcare entitlement spending is due to more than double, from $828 billion this year to $1.837 trillion in 2022. This means healthcare spending will overtake all discretionary spending in 2016 – Obama’s last year in office if reelected. This would be truly unprecedented, and scary, since discretionary spending represents the basic functions of government, including defense, law enforcement, roads, etc. Defense spending in particular is due to drop dramatically next year as a result of the budget deal negotiated last summer. Prior to this deal, healthcare entitlements were due to overtake discretionary spending in 2019. Also, the CBO has increased their estimated costs of Obamacare.

Are revenues doubling as well or is this all going to be borrowed?

Comment_arrow

Patricia Plishka

12:18 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Before you put up this kind of information you really should have checked out how "independent" they really are.
David P. Lewis, Chairman 2009–current Eli Lilly & Co, Vice President Taxes, Tax Council Policy Institute, Treasurer[25];James Lintott pre-1999–current Sterling Foundation Management;Bill Archer 2003–current former Texas Congressman
Wayne E. Gable Koch Industries Dir. of Federal Affairs, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Americans for Prosperity;James C. Miller III Citizens for a Sound Economy; Director of OMB under Pres. Regan;Joseph O. Luby, Jr. Exxon Mobil, VP Tax;James Q. Riordan Mobil, VP Tax; R. Glenn Hubbard Chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers;Michael P. Boyle Microsoft, VP Finance;Douglas Holtz-Eakin American Action Forum; chief economic adviser to Presidential candidate John McCain in 2008;Pamela F. Olson Skadden, Arps; senior economic adviser to the Bush-Cheney campaign & formerly Asst Secretary of Treasury for Tax Policy[27] under Pres. Bush.This "think tank" that is basically a propaganda machine (501c) for the Republican Party. Many of these guys contributors (millions $$$) to Romney's campaign. Just look at the Form 990, schedule B, page 2 to see the private contribution made to fund this "independent" organization, no names are disclosed. does not take a rocket scientist to see that its an organization with a specific agenda. An agenda that failed them with this week's re-election of Obama.

Donald

12:01 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Governor Romney's principal claim on the White House was his business experience, and that he was -- if nothing else -- an experienced manager who was good with balancing the numbers. As it turned out, that claim was proven false. As now conceded by the RNC and its surrogates, it was the Obama campaign who micromanaged the numbers in the battleground states to victory, taking Romney and his Boston "engine room" completely by surprise, by their own admission. So there was indeed nothing behind the governor's red tie, not even superior management or analytical talent. It was President Obama -- a "mere community organizer" -- who out-managed the Republicans and skunked Governor Romney and Representative Ryan (the supposed "numbers whiz"). And we are a better nation for it.

Bryan

12:06 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I am soooo ashamed of my state and My country for putting us right into socialism and class warfare or welfare. It is obvious that the have nots just want to take from the haves (you know the haves that have to work) Well i guess we just have to suck it up and drive our Mercedes a Few more years...

Comment_arrow

Mattie

12:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Here's an idea for all you Teabaggers and Republicans 'mourning' the re-election of Obama;
Pack up some supplies, food, water, first aid kits, Oh! and make sure you have plenty of soap and deodorant - you know- for that rancid smell of fear and loathing (and racism) you people reek of - and go hunker down in some underground survivor's bunker somewhere for the next 4 years, ok?
Hey- Don't forget your guns!

YOU will be happier and feel safer, and gods know WE would all be happier (and safer) without you nutcases running around stinkin' up the place with your stench of hatred.

OR... You can behave like grown up Americans -- Like the rest of us, who've lived through Reagan's terms, Nixon's terms, and *especially* Bush Jr's terms without half as much hand wringing and drama-queen doom and gloom predictions as you guys. And those three are the reasons our country hit the skids for YEARS and eventually ended up in the toilet by 2008.
So Get the Eff Over it Already! Move on.

Comment_arrow

wookfish

12:23 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Mattie, you really need help..thank god for free meds right?

Comment_arrow

Michelle

12:37 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

continue to dismiss half the country as a bunch of lazy, non working, welfare recieving losers who just want free stuff and you will continue to be as out of touch as you were this election which lead to you losing an election that should have been a shoe in. The fact of th ematter is that MANY who voted for Obama work, have never been on assitance and the Mercedes they drive are not leased. Arrogant of you to think that everyone in your same socioecomic bracket shares your same ideolgy. Simply arrogant. GOP and its supporters like you two are getting in your own way and are too self righteous and condesending to see it. Good luck with that mentality. It did you no good this time around and will not serve you well if you continue with it the next 4 years. Get over it and try something new. This rhetoric is tiresome.

Comment_arrow

Monk

12:51 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

There are pinheads who describe welfare recipients as lazy, etc., and that's not right. However, that does not take away from the fact that half the population receives government assistance. It's perfectly reasonable to note that anyone who has become dependent upon government assistance will be inclined to perpetuate and even increase it. This is not a slur on those receiving assistance. It's an indictment of our government's education and economic policies which created the dependency. Romney's "47%" comment was distorted and exploited in a shameless way. Does anyone really want any more than a handful of Americans who cannot stand on their own two feet? Obama's campaign attack on Romney's comment implied that he's all in favor of a dependent citizenry.

Comment_arrow

Michelle

1:43 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Monk - 4.4% of the population is on welfare. when you and other throw out that "half the country is on government assistance" rhetoric you do realize that that include Welfare (again, just 4%) , food stamps, Social Security (seriously, you count that as goverment assistance when people who receive it now WORKED all their lives and get it as a result of WORKING) and Medicaid. And by the way Romney;s 47% comment was NOT distorted. Have to watched it and listented to it ver batum? "There are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it."

"Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax," Romney said, and that his role "is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

Big Jim Givers

12:26 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

FNMA/FreddieMac and the reasoning that "everyone has a right to own a home" is what got us in the economic mess. Pure and simple. Now Republicans and Democrats loved to tout "Minority home ownership" numbers in their regimes. I notice they do not do that anymore.

The economy is going to collapse, get it over with and start over. Someone tell me why it won't. Someone tell me how raising taxes on small businesses is going to help the economy. The economy needs to grow. It is not Already businesses are planning layoffs due to Obamacare. if you do not acknowledge that, you are a blithering idiot.

stewart resmer

12:43 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Are Republicans Really This Stupid?
They demonized unions and tried to take voting rights away from anyone they could. This is what they did for four years, and they thought people would simply sit idly by and watch them do it?

I don't think they're stupid. I think they're spinning, because they have a real problem. They cannot reconcile the purity trolls in their party with the pragmatic thinkers, for starters. They've let the John Birchers take over the party's core, which is a near-promise of irrelevance in the short-term.

They were 'surprised' because they relied on racial division to carry them over the finish line. This is why the despicable John Sununu and Donald Trump were permitted to carry the race card and play it at will. They thought they had the numbers because they believe there are enough racist haters in the world to actually win.

Shocking, isn't it?

tpm.com

Comment_arrow

Ric

1:17 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Sure is. I hope they lick their wounds and reshape into a party of moderates.

Deadone53

12:48 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

CRIES <<<<<<<<<-- Because romney loses and our economy is STILL in the SH*tter.

John Jay

12:49 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The Democrats are the true racists. They invented the KKK, created Jim Crow laws, refused to give voting rights to African Americans...

Now, the Democrats are going to use racism to allow the already broken borders to allow a greater flood of illegals to take away education, health, and social benefits from Americans.

The objective of the Democrats is to tax and destroy America so that that everyone is under the thumb of the government.

Comment_arrow

XJS

12:52 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

The *Southern Democrats who enacted those laws and invented the KKK were absorbed into what is today's republican party.

*Southern because MD is where the KKK was invented.

Comment_arrow

Jason L.

1:02 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Please stop living in a fantasy and snap back to reality. So you're telling me that the Democrats are using racism to attract minorities? Tell me again how the Democrats elected an African American president??? Under Obama, there are about one million illegals deported out of the country.

Comment_arrow

marylou

1:39 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

John,I can see that you still haven't picked up that new tin foil hat yhou ordered from JC Penney.The old one seems to be cutting off circulation to your brain.

John Jay

12:51 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Massive Democrat voting FRAUD in the Presidential Election: http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

Comment_arrow

Ric

1:14 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Hi John Jay! Don't be a sore loser.

I am waiting for my invitation to return to the republican party. The old right wing religious republicans are getting tossed in favor for us more moderates. Hey, there is a welcome for you too - you just got to become a moderate.
I know I am a sore winner. Sorry!

Comment_arrow

Javelin

1:20 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

you're an idiot. You lost big time, get over it.

BellairBerdan

1:24 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

These losers can post under multiple accounts and names and genders but as seen in the election they still only had one vote, and they lost. President Obama won with over 3 million votes more than Romney, and 332 electoral votes. The politics of hate and division were defeated in Senate and Congressional races.

The GOP allowed those "independants" to take over their party, to their failure.

Comment_arrow

Taxes are Fun

1:29 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

It's "independents" to us "losers", and 3 million votes amounts to less than 3% difference in the general vote. If anyone thinks this was a landslide, they have acutely small mental capacity.

Comment_arrow

marylou

1:42 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Taxes,a loss by 1 vote is still a loss.But,look at it this way.At least Ann Romney won't have to downsize her home to move into the White House.

stewart resmer

1:30 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Dead pig wrapped in Mitt Romney T-shirt dumped at GOP office

Comment_arrow

Chester A. Arthur

1:43 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I mean.. when you drop a billiondollars and get no return, you're going to have some people doing some crazy stuff.

Don

1:42 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Anyone who voted for Obama will need to apologize when the Country eventually collapses under his policies.

Comment_arrow

Javelin

1:45 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

You're another idiot. The country collapsed under GWB and we are picking the pieces up. Why don't you fucking pick up a book?

Comment_arrow

Michelle

1:50 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

I'm assuing you voted for Bush both times. but I won't hold my breath for an apology from you for the ecomomic crisis that propelled Obama to victory to begin with in '08.

Don

1:50 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Javelin, did you take your meds today? Nice language too. Typical Lib.

The editor has closed comments for this article.