patching...
Update: Seen anything interesting around town? Post your photos in our Pics & Clips Gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Full-Time Mayorship a 'Bold Move for Bloomingdale,' Mayor Says

Council voted to approve Jonathan Dunleavy taking on administrative responsibilities.

 

In a 4-2 vote, the Bloomingdale Council approved expanding the mayor's position to a full-time role Monday morning.

The council unanimously voted in favor of Jonathan Dunleavy serving in that role. Both council Republicans, Councilwoman Linda Shortman and Councilman Mark Conklin, were not in favor of the new mayoral structure, but lauded Dunleavy for the work he has done assuming administrative responsibilities and said they support him.

Discussion on full-time mayorship had been tabled since Tuesday when Borough Attorney Fred Semrau had advised the council to hold off on voting on the change, unprecedented for Bloomingdale, while he looked into legal concerns raised by former Councilwoman Linda Huntley during a public hearing on the ordinance. Semrau said at Monday's special meeting that having a mayor serve full time does not go against the borough's "strong council, weak mayor" form of government. 

"It's something that's legal and permissable," he said.

The mayor will be paid $84,000 per year (up from $2,000 per year as part-time mayor) and report to the council, with the council having discretion over going back to the part-time mayorship if the members so choose, as long as 90 days notice is provided. 

Dunleavy would not hold the title of administrator, although he will take on responsibilities of the job, as he has been since Ted Ehrenburg left the borough for a position in Bloomfield

"The administrator's position is one that is not required," Semrau said. "It's a position that's supposed to be an extension of the council."

Councilman Ray Yazdi said the difference in salary from what Ehrenburg was making as a full-time administrator and what Dunleavy will be making (he will not be accepting any benefits from the borough) is more than $40,000 per year.

Some of the logistics of the new role still need further discussion. Resident Geraldine Delazier questioned whether the mayor would be able to vote. Semrau said the mayor would likely continue to be able to break a tie on matters that are not a conflict of interest. In the event of a conflict, Bloomingdale Police Chief Joseph Borell would assume borough administrator duties, Councilman John D'Amato explained.

Delazier charged the Democratic council majority of making a political decision to cater to Dunleavy. 

"He'll always be OK in their eyes," she said.

But D'Amato, speaking only for himself, promised that he was not making his decision to vote in favor of the full-time role politically. D'Amato said that if it does not work out, he will be the first to recommend the mayor's position go back to being part-time.

"We have a job to do up here that's right for the borough, not right for the mayor," he said.

Shortman qualified her comments by saying that she was not voting against the full-time mayor's role as a personal slight against Dunleavy, but that she has seen the way full-time mayorship has operated in neighboring communities like Riverdale and Parsippany and she finds there to be flaws. She said she felt creation of the role would be "blurring the lines between executive and administrative" responsibilities.

"Once you combine the political with the administrator's job, [the municipalities with a full-time mayor] will tell you on a one-to-one basis, this is a difficult thing to dissolve," she said.

Shortman said she thinks Dunleavy would make an exceptional administrator, but does not think he should then continue to be mayor.

"I don't think both jobs can be done well," she said.

Yazdi commented, after saying he thinks Dunleavy would serve well in the role, that the council is only faced with the decision of whether to make a full-time mayor's position because of the choices of the former Republican majority-led council.

"We're forced to make a decision today as a result of the actions of the council two years ago," he said.

He referenced the invalidation of borough professionals' contracts and said he felt that decision led to Ehrenburg, former CFO Donna Mollineaux and others wanting to leave the borough. Shortman said the loss of Ehrenburg and Mollineaux, in terms of savings, was not so bad.

"I don't see losing those two people as a negative at all. I see it as a positive," she said.

Yazdi said the loss of two full-time employees in those positions did create an opportunity for the borough to save money. But he also said that quality needs to be considered and that he felt Dunleavy would be able to leverage his experience to do good things for the borough.

Dunleavy sat in the audience for the duration of the meeting as the council members were discussing the items as they related to his employment. But the mayor did offer some comments after the ordinances were approved.

"It certainly is a bold move for Bloomingdale," Dunleavy said of creating the full-time position.

The mayor said that when discussion began on full-time mayorship, it was intended to be, and still is, an interim position, allowing the council to search for an administrator that could come at the same savings to the borough as Dunleavy's full-time position would be. He noted that he will not be getting a contract. Dunleavy also said that if a new administrator were hired, the time it would take to familiarize that person with borough issues and pending projects would jeopardize initiatives already in the works.

"Bloomingdale is on the cusp of some really big and good things about to happen," he said.

He included the redevelopment of Union Avenue and Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) program with the company formerly known as AvalonBay and said there is more on the horizon that is not able to be discussed publicly.

"It is imperative that we keep the momentum," he said.

Dunleavy promised the council, public, and specifically Delazier, that he would prove that the decision to create a full-time mayor's position is not political and that he will do a good job.

"It's about Bloomingdale. It's not about Democrats, it's not about Jon Dunleavy. It's about all of us," he said.

  • Do you think the council made a good decision moving to a full-time mayor?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        17 (70%)
    • No
        7 (29%)
    Total votes: 24
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Bloomingdale Council, Bloomingdale Mayor, Full-Time Mayor, and Jon Dunleavy

PCB Social Media Arts

12:09 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

I guess Linda's legal concerns for which she supposedly spoke with lawyers and such, is once again, a fail. People, its time to stop taking anything that woman says with anything but a grain of salt. #LindaFailsAgain

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda

7:33 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Paul, I really think it is time you find the facts before making your comments. Although I doubt the facts would stop you. However, I gave the Borough Atty the name and phone number of the person I spoke to so that he could also speak to him. So there is no one I supposedly spoke to but someone I did speak to.

Comment_arrow

paul bastante

8:33 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

All I know linda, is everytime you open your mouth, the process stops and it is later revealed that you are WRONG! These are the facts as I know them Kristen, I mean, Linda.'

Comment_arrow

Kristen

10:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Paul,

I suggest you get your facts straight. I am Kristen not Linda and your innuendoes are completely inappropriate. Just because you do not know me, and based on your posts, I am thankful for that, does not mean I am someone else. Keep your rididulous comments to yourself.

Karen Timpanaro

1:17 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Congratulations Jon, this is one of the best things that could happen for our town.

Reply

STEVE SMITS

1:23 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Congrats Jon,
Only good things can happen from this. The savings for the borough are a bonus.
Thank You

Reply

Meg Gray

7:33 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Congrats. Good news for Bloomingdale.

Reply

Carolyn

7:33 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

We should congratulate the town. I believe that the voters who watched the over-spending of the last Council on ineffective Professionals, along with the repeated loss of personnel, should be credited with making the landslide decision to fix things. The town gets to save money yet again, which is a good thing. I think the objections raised by Huntley sound weak and that we certainly need to give this a try. If it doesn't work we can always go back to the old way. It would probably take a very long time to get a new person up to speed anyway. I don't see where any authentic reason was raised for not at least trying it. And I do believe D'Amato when he says he will evaluate the results honestly.

Reply

Jonathan Smith

7:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Every article I have read about Bloomingdale I see that every vote is along party lines. I am glad I live in Butler, I feel sorry for the residents of Bloomingdale that have to put up with Partisan BS. As a council member you are supposed to vote for what is in the best interest of the town. From what I have seen that isn't happening. This is a prime example of what is wrong with our country. Good Luck !!

Reply

Andy

7:16 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

The town has now been fair to a man who has been doing a full time job without being paid for it. Jon Dunleavy and his family have been giving of themselves to Bloomingdale for over a decade. You now have a guy who has been raising his kids in community, giving of his time for the community now employed by the community ... How can he not be motivated to do the very best job? God Bless you and your family Jon... Good Luck too.

Reply

Maryanne Conti

8:33 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I believe we're in good hands, congrats John.

Reply

Karen Hoffman

4:46 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I don't understand why a town the size of Bloomingdale needs a full time mayor, nor do I understand why the salary for a part time mayor is so hight. No wonder taxes are so high in Bloomingdale. The politicians in this town think they are running a major city.

I is also a disgrace how much the sewer/water bills are for the residents of Bloomingdale are. I know someone who lives in a Duplex and each side is charged the $150 base rate and they share the same sewer line.

I would like to see the budget for the water department.

Reply

Andy

10:09 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I hear ya... part time mayor making a whopping; $5.47 PER DAY. Then he decides that's not enough pain and suffering for he and his family so, he agrees to take on the Mayoral duties and the Borough Administrator responsibilities to try to keep the town as wonderful as it was when he moved his family here and to move it forward with as little issues or taxes as possible ... for another whopping $9.58 per hour because now he'll be working 24/7 and regardless of how good a job he does; there will always be people who make broad, uninformed, personal disparaging statements... go down to the municipal building, go to the utilities department and discuss your water issues... I'm just saying

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Hoffman

6:50 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

For the size of Bloomingdale the taxes are way too high. And a full time mayor isn't necessary nor the high part time salary. I didn't vote for this person nor anyone that was running on his ticket. I understand he is a very nice man, but that doesn't mean he isn't out to fill his pockets off the backs of taxpayers. And the base rate for the water is criminal.

Jon Dunleavy

10:01 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Karen Hoffman,
For the record, I have been appointed a full time Mayor in lieu of hiring a Business Administrator.The savings to the Borough will be in excess of $50,000.I have been and will continue to be completely dedicated to serving the Borough as well as making a difference in the quality of life for your residents.Your remarks are quite strong and misdirected.Iwould ask that you consider getting involved.Please attend meetings, serve on a commission. Send me your email so I can add you to my distribution list that I send to keep our residents informed.It is important to me that you understand the role I have been appointed too as well as understand the operation of our Sewer and Water department.There is no question our rates are high, but it is not a result of 3 employees,who do work extremely hard for the Borough.What we pay for water and the expenses we incur from being part of the Pequannock RIver Basin Sewer Authority are the same expenses that the other towns pay, the difference is we only have 2000 users to share that cost because less then half our town is on sewer and water.As compared to many other towns 80-100% of these towns are sewered resulting in an overall lower cost because the cost are shared amongst the users. The answer is repair are infrastructure and add more users through smart growth.It is a complicated issued and important to learn the facts.Please call my cell 973 723 2695 any time to discuss any Borough issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Hoffman

10:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

I don't understand how a part time mayor could make $82,000 a year nor pay an administrator $134,000 a year. Bloomingdale is not Clifton, Bloomfield or Paramus. It is a little rural town that is taking it's residents for a ride.

If you don't have enough residents using the water system I don't think it's fair to rape those that do. I live in a duplex and both sides share the same sewer. We should be charge $75.00 a quarter base rate - not the $150 like a single family household. Also, I live alone, work all day and don't have a dishwasher. It is hard to believe my water bill is $200 a quarter and it's not even summer yet.

Maybe it's also time to think about outsourcing trash pick up as many towns do now. Bloomfield has been doing that since the 60's.

I am new in the town and don't know how things were before you were elected, but my experience is each party always complain about one another.

Comment_arrow

Rich Dellaripa

12:10 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The $82,000 salary is for a Mayor serving full time. A part time Mayor's salary is $2,000.

Leave a comment