Power Line Project Challenged By Federal Lawsuit
PSE&G Susquehanna-Roseland line will run through several local communities.
Several environmentalists are hoping to stop Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) Company's Susquehanna-Roseland power line project through a new lawsuit filed in federal court.
The suit claims that PSE&G's project will damage the scenery and ecology of the three national parks the line, which will go from Berverwick, Pa., to Roseland, will be in, according to Neighbor News. The suit's intent is to stop construction on the line until a court ruling can be made on whether the National Park Service's approval of the project is in compliance with federal law.
Read the full story from Neighbor News here.
The 500-volt line project, which began with a pre-construction phase in September, impacts several local communities. The transmission line will go through 45 miles of the state in total.
According to PSE&G, the intention of the project is to improve "reliable electric service."
In addition to the federal lawsuit, the project has been met with opposition locally. In Montville, one resident started a petition asking PSE&G to bury the power lines instead of installing them on high towers and in Jefferson, residents have expressed concern that the line could lower their property values.
Michele Guttenberger
2:10 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
The Borough of Hopatcong was pleased with the PSE&G Settlement and have listed it as a grant or donation on their records - of course that was the officials of Hopatcong. Most of the residents of Hopatcong will find out about this project when they begin construction. You'll never find a protest from residents of Hopatcong because there are few public open meetings and the ones that take place aren't well announced and poorly attended. This keeps the amount of protesting down and enables officials to proceed with their rubber stamping.
nick
10:43 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
You got that right we always find out after the fact ,like the cable contract .So long as the town hall and the schools have free service the heck with the poor service the rest of us get our politicians in this town are a disgrace but they keep getting voted back in Mabey someday the people of Hopatcong will wise up and come out and vote.
The Watcher
10:55 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Let us not forget that our "officials" took money from PSE&G to NOT speak out against the lines. They chose to take the money and run rather than stand with other communities and make PSE&G more accountable. These lines are maintained by a man hanging off the side of a helicopter while the lines are still LIVE ! I for one think we should have had a vote. This is just another reason why the ALL meetings NEED to be televised. They took the money from Hudson Farm to upgrade the courtroom and camera system so why aren't they televised? Where was our environmental committee? Even though they are appointed by the mayor and council I would hope that at least one of them would have spoken up, or is everything and every committee under mayor and council control?
Peter Greendyk
7:14 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Environmental impact or not, I'm reading about this issue on a computer in a well-lighted room in a heated house having just made coffee in an electric coffee maker, hoping we don't lose power today, etc. I can't help but think that every protester enjoys the same amenities. We can start to take these protests more seriously when all those who protest deny themselves any modern covenience powered by the means against which they protest - electricity, natural gas, gasoline, diesel, etc, and start to walk to their protests which should occur without electrical amplification, cell phone communication or on-line organization efforts. What if PSEG, JCPL, LILCO etc. had to respond to the recent storm cleanup with hand saws, horse drawn carts and handwritten notes delivered by modern day Paul Reveres? Deeds need to match words, or please be quiet!
brian hickey
8:17 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Pete,
Look into the details of the project. The scope involves removing all of the existing lattice towers that are currently 85 feet tall and replacing them with new structures that are 190 feet tall. There isn't anything that large in NJ as far as I know. They're typically seen out west traversing a desert. Nobody disputes the comfort of electricity and the need. But the dispute is if the capacity increase was necessary and why they didn't build a new route along an interstate, rail line or other non residential or national park area.
Our reliability problems stem from the last mile feeds into our homes. Not backbone transmission from generation to distribution center.
Dave Reines
8:01 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
although a 'tree hugger' I realize that all the great stuff in my home, from the coffee maker to the tv all consume electricity. We need to keep up with the growing demands. Unless I am wrong, it looks to me like more of an upgrade to areas that already had these towers and not cutting new lines out of forested areas. This project was destined to be done, no matter how many public hearings they held. if it wasn't done there wouldn't be enough power to keep up with demand.
Peter Greendyk
10:14 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
I agree with you Dave. I live very close to the power lines in the Montville section of town and would much rather see upgrades to an existing line and towers than have to deal with additional loss of habitat and environmental disruption from a new one.
Barb Belton
8:44 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Although we have the comforts of home with things run by electricity, what about the health of the people and the wildlife..I for one am a heart patient with problems with the electrical patterns in the heart..low EMF (Electrical field radiation) which is colorless, odorless and dangerous to the health of everyone and everything around.. Now we have to worry about the higher voltage emitting more unseen worries.. http://www.think-aboutit.com/energy/pwr_line.htm .. there are several links associated with this and if you think this is not happening now, go and educate yourselves more than just spouting off on your immediate feelings..Everyone wants technology, but the question is... Is it safe?
Michele Guttenberger
10:24 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
Barb - Thanks for the insightful link on the health dangers of electric fields. Most importantly the last line "1996, a U.S. Federal Court ruled that citizens may not bring suit against electric power companies over electromagnetic radiation emissions." So this how are elected officials have taken care of its constituents when they allowed an enormous size increase of existing overhead power lines to its nearby residents. Did our elected officials read unbiased studies from other sources that would confirm this statement " Many scientists warn people not to live within 200 yards of high voltage power lines. Of 35 international research studies on electric field radiation, 33 established a conclusive link between brain tumors, leukemia, and other forms of cancer." Did our elected officials concern themselves with the residents that were within 200 yards of these towers? Were these people notified of these enormous changes to these existing power lines and that they could NOT seek any personal restitutions when the borough or town accepted this settlements from PSE&G? NOT
tree hugger
9:38 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012
In Boonton/Montville/Kinnelon, the construction has already begun about a month ago! Once green/protected areas are covered with layers of gravel for easier access for the huge equipment. Across from the Kincaid home was once fields but now looks like a giant parking lot-not to mention the work in Pyramid Mt. I don't see how this will ever be restored to it's natural state-between this and all the trees down from Sandy and the following storms, it's a disaster area and I don't know why anyone would want to come back here to enjoy the "natural" scenery. I LIVE in this area and even with all the trees, luckily, have not had any issues with getting power. I'd be interested to know where the people who "have electricity and are enjoying their cups of coffee", reside? Just like the Highlands Act, providing water for the entire state of NJ and having no say in what happens in our own backyards, get ready, here it comes again!
V
12:13 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
One important thing to consider for New Jersey residents is that the powerline will NOT improve electric supply stability in the state. It's First Energy bringing coal electricity to customers in New York City.
brian hickey
12:19 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012
exactly.
Barb Belton
8:11 am on Monday, December 31, 2012
I have also read that this project will be directed to NYC only.. I think that if NYC or any major city in the US needs power, Solar Panels or even Wind Energy is the way to go..Place these harmless components on the roofs of all high rises..This would produce more power and provide enough electricity for NYC and then some..It would also create more jobs..Everyone wants to go Green, so here is NYC's chance to show other cities that it can be done.. I've said my peace and a very Happy New Year everyone and thanks for your comment Michele..
D Ambriano
1:29 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Very true, and something the "Reliability Project" people don't want you to know...this construction is NOT benefiting the people of NJ in any way, shape or form. Even the original FERC paperwork states that the sole purpose of the project is to increase capacity to New York (translation: where we can charge more and make more money) despite the fact that this entire thing is ratepayer funded. So, everyone who doesn't see what the big deal is, think again. You are paying for something you will never use, never receive the benefit of, and which will destroy property values and wildlife habitat, and potentially negatively impact the health of thousands of people.