.
News Alert
UPDATE: Massive Brush Fire Rages In Berkeley,…

Bloomingdale to Run Shelter Without BASS

Council voted 6-0 to run shelter internally.

After 16 years of servicing the borough, will no longer be sheltering animals in after the borough council voted 6-0 to run the shelter internally Tuesday.

The council discussed the issue in a late executive session during Tuesday night's meeting and Mayor Jonathan Dunleavy said following the discussion, Councilman John D'Amato motioned that the borough run the shelter in-house "due to financial issues in the borough." The motion was seconded by Councilman Ray Yazdi and approved unanimously.

BASS has been with the borough for most of this year and in years prior to compensate them for sheltering services for seven towns that were added to BASS' responsibilities through shared services agreements. The the donor-funded organization a contract Dec. 30 which would have given them $31,500 per year, but BASS requested several material and non-material changes to both the contract and the lease agreement for the Brandt Lane facility. Those changes included requesting additional money from the borough to pay utility bills, flood protection in the way of a new building should the current facility be damaged, lowering the insurance requirement needed on the facility and allowing BASS to keep fixtures they install. Also, BASS disagreed with a 120-day clause in the contract which would allow either entity to void the contract with 120 days notice if it was not beneficial to the entity.

After the council's last meeting, on the contract in hopes they could negotiate with the borough. But after the governing body met to discuss the matter for the first time since the bid was rescinded on Tuesday, the council decided to move forward without BASS.

At the , some council members indicated their disappointment with a decision BASS made the weekend before without giving the borough notice. The animals that were at the shelter were brought to private homes for fostering. While notice was not required by law since BASS was not under contract at the time, Borough Administrator Ted Ehrenburg said he felt that it was not out of good faith to not tell the borough their intentions before vacating. BASS President Ellen Ribitzki has argued that the organization was expecting funding from the borough for January and February (prior to awarding the contract, the borough had for several months but after the contract was offered, discontinued the payments) and that the BASS board of directors felt that if they did not leave on their own accord, they were at risk of the borough taking fixtures that BASS owned.

After BASS left, the borough took on animal sheltering responsibilities until the council made a decision on whether to move forward with BASS or operate the shelter internally. In the first seven days of having control over the shelter, Ehrenburg said no animals were brought in by the Animal Control Office (ACO) and on the eighth day, two dogs and four cats were brought in but they were quickly reclaimed.

Ehrenburg said the borough will not be rescuing animals but instead, focus on adopting out animals being brought in by ACO. 

"Now we're not rescuing animals. We bring them in but we process them to find homes or other rescues so we don't have the carrying cost of the operation but these animals are finding homes," he said.

Ehrenburg also said that while the shelter will not be a kill-shelter, the intent of the borough is not for the animals to be sheltered in Bloomingdale for several years. Ehrenburg said the borough will be reaching out to other local organizations for help adopting out the animals if needed.

"One of the mistakes that was made in the past was that animals were left to linger there for years," he said.

Ehrenburg does not feel that animals will be in the shelter for as long as they have been in the past because the borough plans to re-energize the operation, re-naming the shelter North Jersey Community Shelter and motivating the volunteers. He said 14 volunteers have already come forward to help with the operation.

As for the costs of the re-vamped shelter, Ehrenburg said since the contract that was offered to BASS was for $31,500 per year, he plans to pro-rate that amount and run the shelter under that cost figure.

Ribitzki said Wednesday that she had not heard about the borough's intentions to not move forward with BASS but that she was not surprised. She also said she is concerned about the animals that were taken out of the shelter in Bloomingdale already.

"The outlook for the animals is not good obviously," she said, referring to the animals that come in to the shelter in the future.

Ribitzki said she is skeptical that the borough will be able to run the shelter for the $31,500 per year. She also noted that BASS has spent a significant amount of money, $150,000 to renovate the facility and that she did not feel that BASS' requests of the borough were unreasonable.

"This is what we needed to keep the shelter at the level of care that we had been providing at this time," she said.

Ribitzki said BASS will be seeking a new location to continue their operation.

dweezie48 March 07, 2012 at 05:46 PM
BASS will be better off where ever they wind up moving to. As far as cost, now Bloomingdale will really see what it cost to run a shelter, and it will be alot more than BASS was asking for. Good luck to all.
Sherry Bednarz-Mosier March 07, 2012 at 06:32 PM
does the town now have to provide insurance and a shelter licence?
dweezie48 March 07, 2012 at 08:59 PM
In my opinion, this will turn out just like FOWA where after a month or so, the town realized what a hole they were digging themselves into, realized what it really cost to run the shelter and begged the volunteer organization to come back, and the organization said no. In my opinion, Maybe the excessive costs they don't yet see, but will down the road should come out of some individuals salaries.
jersey girl March 08, 2012 at 12:54 AM
What a shame that certain BASS board members have shut another shelter. This is now the third shelter that has been closed because of certain board members and their behavior towards the municipality they were in. I seriously don't think that BASS will be asked to help at the new shelter, so they don't have to worry about being asked!
Ann March 08, 2012 at 02:19 AM
Isn't is a shame that the boro needs to provide a shelter for animals that aren't being cared for by their owners. We're already in a deficit, we don't need another.
dweezie48 March 08, 2012 at 03:42 AM
In my opinion, you can thank your town administrator and council for the mess that your town is now in because of the lack of insight and forward thinking. They didn't want to spend $31,000 to give to BASS, they will spend at least 4 times that if the town runs the shelter the way it should be run, and not as a cash cow for some who think it is. The town had 6 years of a free ride from BASS, and that's how they thought it should be, well now they will find out what the real costs are, and hopefully those costs will come out of the people's pockets who made these ill informed decisions. Good luck to you all, as the saying goes, we learn from our mistakes, and this will be a hard lesson learned by the town, administrator and council, in my opinion.
paul bastante March 08, 2012 at 04:36 AM
All of course your opinion Dweezie. Right now, it is what it is and the town has decided to move forward. Whatever the North Jersey Community Shelter needs from me, I, as well as others, will be there to do whatever needs to be done.
dweezie48 March 08, 2012 at 04:50 AM
Good luck to you and all others involved and enjoy the political koolaid that everyone has been given to drink from certain town individuals. I wish nothing but the best for the animals involved, as well as everyone who truly care about the animals and not the politics here. The animal shelter should be about the care of animals and not a quick buck as some have lead the town to believe it is.
paul bastante March 08, 2012 at 09:47 PM
A quick buck, huh?
paul bastante March 08, 2012 at 09:55 PM
Dweezie, I know that all anyone heard from BASS people was that it was all about the animals. Will YOU be volunteering at the new Bloomingdale shelter, The North Jersey Community Shelter?
jersey girl March 08, 2012 at 10:43 PM
I know that Dweezie won't be up here to volunteer FOR the animals, but there will be a lot of us who will be. And the most important thing is that we will be there strictly to donate out time and love to the animals. Dweezie it was not the BA as you continue to claim, shame on you. BASS was the ones who left the shelter under their own devices. Were you involved with the negotiations? It was all about money, not the animals! They were the ones bringing animals from all over the country to make a "quick buck", never informing the town of that practice. Where is all the money for the "rescues"? No financial accountability was given to the town as they were required to do. That is not how you conduct yourself at all!
dweezie48 March 09, 2012 at 03:32 AM
My opinion is that Jersey Girl used to be the top part of the party that ran BASS, and that is only my opinion, but the way certain things were phrased in her last post, I have heard very similiar things before, and I have a good memory. As far as Paul's question, I used to volunteer for BASS, so I understand what actually happened, as opposed to what everyone was lead to believe. Look, in the end, no matter what happens, it is the animals that are the most important thing, it is unfortunate that some people choose to play both sides of the fence, and they know who they are.
dweezie48 March 09, 2012 at 03:37 AM
Yes, Nancy, you are correct, I won't ever volunteer at the shelter the way it is being run now.
paul bastante March 09, 2012 at 03:38 AM
Yes or no. all that matters is now.
dweezie48 March 09, 2012 at 04:00 AM
And now will sooner rather than later meet reality when it is realized running the shelter will cost much more than $30,000 a year. I don't have time to sit here and debate every action made by either side, but I can see that in my opinion, there are some who have volunteered and served on BASS's board in the past who are now leading the pack in the new group of volunteers against BASS. I ask the former president, who's side are you really on, and what is your true cause???
dweezie48 March 09, 2012 at 04:35 AM
That's what I thought Nancy, you don't have an answer. Please feel free to tell everyone that you were the president of BASS for 11 years and now you are an advocate against everything that BASS stands for, and although this is my opinion, there are alot of facts to point to this being the truth. I am happy that I am not one of your followers.
dweezie48 March 09, 2012 at 05:06 AM
Please don't forget to tell everyone that the former president of BASS who was still president of BASS within the past year and a half is now leading the pack against everything BASS stood for.
jersey girl March 10, 2012 at 12:48 AM
dweezie48, hahahahahahaha. Thank you for the best laugh in a long time. No I am not Nancy,but thank you for the compliment. Nancy was the best person to run the shelter, until the recent board ran her out. It wasn't until that bunch took over, removed Nancy, and then made it a rescue bringing in animals from all over including PR.
dweezie48 March 12, 2012 at 01:38 AM
Ah yes, sounds like the typical koolaid that she would try and give everyone to drink, that everyone drove her out, and nothing was ever her fault!!!! Why don't you ask her how many volunteers she drove out while she was the BASS president for 11 years and until just last year??? I know of quite a few myself. She should know better than anyone else that the shelter can't possibly be run for less than what BASS was asking, because she was part of the negotiations over the past 6 years, and was president until just last year, so give me a break!! I'm sure that Liz, Sam, Marilyn and the rest of Nancy's crew that were hired personnel by her at BASS while she was president will be part of the 14 volunteers that they currently have. They should know better as well, that it's extremely unlikely that it can be run for less than $31,000 a year especially if more towns are added, bringing the total to 10. I wish the animals nothing but the best and I know the best will be done to make that happen, but in my opinion and being realistic and have being part of BASS until recently, it's going to be much more expensive than anyone is being lead to believe. Good luck to everyone...
dweezie48 March 12, 2012 at 02:29 AM
Tell me who they were, since Nancy was the president of BASS for the past 11 years, up until last year, please tell me who is responsible??? Isn't the president in charge, and running the rest of the group??
dweezie48 March 12, 2012 at 03:18 AM
What were the other 2 shelters?? If you are going to post information, please verify it's accuracy, and the people involved?? Nancy has been the president of BASS for the past 11 years, up until last year, so tell me who shut another two shelters??? Isn't the president who is the one in charge??? Stop the smoke screen.
dweezie48 March 12, 2012 at 04:04 AM
Also, please tell me why the ACO was given a $20,000 a year raise last year while no money was given to BASS?? It seems that it was realized that the ACO would have more work with more towns added, but BASS wouldn't have any more expense involved with all the extra animals brought in. How is that fair?? In my opinion, this seems like a very very unfair practice of trying to bring in more money at someone else's expense.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something